Why Caitlin Clark's WNBA Draft Pick Sparked Controversy Among Fans

Caitlin Clark 2024 WNBA Draft

Sarah Stier/Getty Images

Caitlin Clark was chosen as the No. 1 pick in the WNBA**** draft, but her starting salary may not be as high as fans were hoping for. The 22-year-old University of Iowa standout was drafted by the Indiana Fever on Monday, April 15. According to Sportrac, Clark is set to sign a four-year contract valued at $338,056. In her first year with the Fever, she is expected to earn $76,535, which is the standard salary for the top four picks in a draft class.

Clark's salary is expected to increase each year, reaching $78,066 in 2025, $85,873 in 2026, and $97,582 in 2027. In her final year, there is an option for the Fever to decide whether to keep her on the team or let her become a free agent.

Many have pointed out that the salaries in the WNBA**** are significantly lower compared to those in the NBA. For instance, a rookie in the NBA starts with a salary of $1,119,563. Last year's No. 1 draft pick in the NBA, Victor Wembanyama, signed a $55 million contract with the San Antonio Spurs. The upcoming 2024 NBA draft is anticipated to include players like Alexandre Sarr, Zaccharie Risacher, and Bronny James.

NFL quarterback Russell Wilson expressed his backing for Clark and other underpaid female athletes. He shared Clark's salary details on X and wrote, "These women truly deserve better... Praying for a brighter future."

Today, Hoda Kotb, host of the show, expressed her opinion that the current leading figure in women's basketball should be receiving a higher salary than what was offered to her.

In a recent episode of Today on Tuesday, April 16, Hoda Kotb mentioned that the salary amount of $76,000 in the first year, $78,000 in the second year, and $85,000 in the third year seemed unreasonable for someone who is considered the face of women's basketball. She pointed out the significant difference in pay compared to a male NBA player who could earn $10 million in their first year.

With Clark’s talent and popularity in the sports world, she is likely to receive additional income through sponsorships and deals. However, some critics argue that this is not enough.

One commenter on Instagram pointed out, “Everyone who says not to worry because she gets endorsements is missing the point. Men also receive endorsements but earn millions more. It is unfair, and there is no positive way to spin it. Change is necessary. Hopefully, the league will attract more viewers and these women will receive fairer pay. Can you imagine the top NBA draft pick earning less than $100k a year?”

Some people are concerned about the impact on other female athletes who were selected after Clark. They worry about how their salaries might be affected, especially at a time when women's sports are gaining more viewers.

Clark gained national attention for her impressive performance both on and off the court during the women's March Madness tournament. Despite her success, Clark and the Iowa Hawkeyes ended up losing to the South Carolina Gamecocks in the championship game. Prior to the tournament, Clark revealed her intention to pursue a professional basketball career.

"I cannot thank everyone enough for the incredible support I have received during my time at Iowa," Clark expressed through X in March. "My teammates have truly made the past four years the most memorable; my coaches, trainers, and staff have always allowed me to be myself; the Hawkeye fans who pack [Carver-Hawkeye Arena] every night; and all those who came out to cheer us on nationwide, especially the young fans."

Editor's P/S:

The article highlights the glaring disparity in salaries between the WNBA**** and the NBA. Despite being the top draft pick, Caitlin Clark's starting salary of $76,535 is a far cry from the millions earned by male NBA rookies. This discrepancy is particularly disheartening considering Clark's exceptional talent and the growing popularity of women's sports. The low salaries in the WNBA**** not only affect the players but also hinder the league's growth and ability to attract top talent.

The article also raises concerns about the impact on other female athletes who were selected after Clark. Their salaries may be even lower, further exacerbating the gender pay gap. This situation underscores the need for collective action to address the systemic undervaluation of women's sports. It is imperative that organizations, sponsors, and fans recognize the value of female athletes and advocate for fair compensation. By raising awareness and demanding change, we can create a more equitable and just sporting landscape for all.