Unveiling the Epic Transformation: Netflix's 2019 Medieval Movie Starring R-Pats Leaves Experts Spellbound

Unveiling the Epic Transformation: Netflix's 2019 Medieval Movie Starring R-Pats Leaves Experts Spellbound

Netflix's 2019 medieval movie, The King, receives a critical blow as an expert mercilessly dismantles it, leaving Robert Pattinson's performance likened to a heap of rubbish The accuracy of the film is severely questioned, tarnishing its reception

Summary

A medieval arms and armor expert criticizes Robert Pattinson's character in Netflix's The King, pointing out historical inaccuracies in the armor he wears for single combat.

The film receives a disappointing one out of 10 rating from the expert due to its lack of historical accuracy, particularly in regards to Pattinson's armor and overall portrayal of the Battle of Agincourt. Despite receiving mostly positive feedback from critics, historians raised concerns about its notable departures from actual historical events.

In a recent YouTube video shared by Insider, Tobas Capwell, the curator of arms and armor at The Wallace Collection in London, critiques the historical accuracy of Netflix's The King. Breaking down scenes from the movie, Capwell particularly criticizes aspects of Robert Pattinson's character, who portrays Louis de Guyenne, Dauphin of France. The film, directed by David Michôd, is based on source material from William Shakespeare and stars Timothée Chalamet as the Prince of Wales and later King Henry V of England. Capwell delves into the accuracy of the medieval epic, especially in relation to the 1415 Battle of Agincourt where Pattinson's character attempts to duel with Chalamet's character.

Capwell highly criticizes the armor worn by Pattinson's character during his single combat scene in the Battle of Agincourt, stating that it is inaccurately representative of the time period. As a result, Capwell rates the film with a disappointing score of one out of ten. Capwell's complete comment regarding Pattinson's appearance is as follows:

"R-Pats' appearance is extremely unimpressive, resembling nothing more than a heap of rubbish. It is a jumble of different elements that vaguely belong to the 15th century, but they are actually about a generation too late for the Battle of Agincourt. Furthermore, the helmet he wears is ludicrous. Its profile highly resembles that of the 16th century, but it not only fits poorly, but it is also excessively oversized and clunky."

How Was Netflix's The King Received?

Unveiling the Epic Transformation: Netflix's 2019 Medieval Movie Starring R-Pats Leaves Experts Spellbound

The King received positive reviews upon its release, with particular praise given to the performances. Chalamet displayed his star power with nuance and power in the quieter moments, while also excelling in the action-oriented sequences. Pattinson's portrayal in The King divided audiences, with some finding issue with his campy approach to the character and exaggerated French accent.

Although critics responded favorably, historians raised concerns about several aspects of The King. The source material from Shakespeare includes numerous historical inaccuracies, which the film also embraces. Alongside the use of anachronistic armor, the movie takes significant liberties with the portrayal of King Henry V, depicting him as peace-seeking despite historical evidence suggesting he was a more aggressive and war-prone leader.

The Battle of Agincourt in The King, departs significantly from historical accuracy. Louis was not present at the battle, and the single combat scene is entirely fictionalized. However, Chalamet's exceptional acting skills and captivating action sequences make The King an intriguing showcase. Yet, for a deeper understanding of the historical period portrayed in the film, it is advisable to explore alternative sources.