Warning: The content ahead contains spoilers regarding The Witcher Season 3 and the books. The long-awaited arrival of The Witcher season 3 has finally happened, fulfilling the hopes of Henry Cavill. However, it may be too late to revive the series. Initially gaining popularity, Netflix's The Witcher has faced disappointment from many fans regarding its overall creative direction. Adding to the show's struggles is Henry Cavill's announcement that he will be departing from the series after this season. Speculation has arisen that Cavill's decision to leave stems from his frustration with the show's lack of loyalty to its source material.
While The Witcher seasons 1 and 2 incorporate numerous plot points and characters from Andrzej Sapkowski's novels, they also introduce significant changes and additions. In season 2, the inclusion of a monolith-centric overarching plot is not found in the books. Additionally, certain characters, notably Yennefer of Vengerberg (Anya Chalotra), have faced criticism for deviating too much from their book counterparts. These alterations seem to have become overwhelming for Henry Cavill, leading to his departure from the series. Unfortunately for Cavill, The Witcher season 3 finally seems to have addressed his concerns.
The Witcher Season 3 Is VERY Book Accurate (Like Henry Cavill Wanted)
Cavill's departure from The Witcher after season 3 is disappointing because it is the most faithful season to the books. Season 3 closely follows the overall plot of the novels and includes several scenes directly from the books. For instance, Ciri's duel with the Wyvern in Gors Velen and her escape from the city with the Wild Hunt closely mirror the corresponding book scenes. Additionally, the scene where Jaskier and Ciri jokingly imitate Geralt and Yennefer's conversation from afar is also taken from the books.
Although The Witcher show cannot include all the storylines from the books, season 3 does a much better job of adapting the ones it can use. If the show had started with this level of loyalty to the source material, it might have persuaded Henry Cavill to stay. Unfortunately, it seems to be too little, too late. Nevertheless, the increased faithfulness to the books in season 3 is a positive sign for the show's future. If the series can survive without Cavill and maintain this level of loyalty, there is hope for it to regain its popularity and win back fans.
The Witcher Season 3's Book Accuracy Doesn't Fix Its Problems (& It's Too Late)
Regrettably, The Witcher encounters significant hurdles, and while season 3 might be the most faithful adaptation of the books so far, it appears that rescuing the show is a difficult task at this point. The departure of Henry Cavill poses a substantial setback that will be challenging to overcome. Cavill's immense fame has become inseparable from the character of Geralt of Rivia, making it almost impossible to find a suitable replacement. Additionally, the series grapples with broader concerns relating to its characters and storyline.
Despite its heightened adherence to the source material, The Witcher season 3 repeats a previous misstep in character representation and fails to strike the right balance among its multiple plotlines. The show ambitiously encompasses numerous characters and story arcs, with many captivating narratives, yet they often feel incomplete or lacking development. The Witcher has not quite mastered the art of intertwining disconnected storylines and unifying them in a meaningful manner, as Game of Thrones once accomplished. In combination with these issues of character and plot development and the absence of Cavill, it appears increasingly improbable that The Witcher can regain its initial popularity.