Insights into American Politics: Putin's Perspective
Insightful perspective on the evolving dynamics between US and Ukraine, shedding light on potential shifts in American support A must-read analysis by Julian Zelizer
The Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's confidence is certainly shaken after leaving Washington without the approval of additional US military funding for his country amidst the ongoing war with Russia.
President Joe Biden has emphasized the importance of Congress continuing to support Ukraine. However, the administration's request for over $60 billion in emergency supplemental funding has been met with strong opposition from Republicans. The GOP is insisting on the passage of strict border policies from Democrats in exchange for backing the military aid package, casting a shadow over Ukraine's future. Even if a deal is eventually reached between the two parties, it is expected that each subsequent aid package will encounter increasing resistance and more obstacles.
Carrot harvesting is underway at a farm in Lviv, Ukraine on Tuesday, Oct. 10, 2023. The presence of a skilled workforce and the ability to source products locally are key factors attracting consumer food manufacturers to Ukraine. Captured by photographer Julia Kochetova/Bloomberg via Getty Images.
The US cannot turn its back on Ukraine's economy, especially when we are making progress in the conflict.
Russian President Vladimir Putin seems determined to stick to his plans in Ukraine, as he stated in a recent press conference. He emphasized that peace will only come once his goals are achieved and suggested that repairing relations with the US would require "internal changes."
Putin has been patiently waiting for the unified front in Washington and among NATO allies to collapse. Although we can't know his exact thoughts, it's likely that he took into account the growing skepticism of US interventionism, the political division in Capitol Hill, and our short attention spans.
After the failed wars in Vietnam and Iraq, American support for foreign intervention has been delicate. The legacy of these wars means that generations of Americans have seen policymakers justify operations with false and misleading information. The fear of a military conflict spiraling out of control, causing significant casualties, leaving veterans scarred, and costing billions of dollars to the detriment of domestic programs remains all too real.
This is not to suggest that skepticism towards the war in Ukraine is unfounded, as the threats to NATO's safety and stability are significant given Putin's ambitions. However, regardless of the war's legitimacy, US presidents face challenges in maintaining strong public support for foreign intervention or military aid. It is likely that support will eventually wane, and we may be approaching that point.
Another crucial point is that achieving enduring bipartisan support in a politically polarized era is nearly impossible. Although there are moments of unity, such as the initial response to Russia's assault on Ukraine in February 2022, the red-blue political divide will inevitably take over.
Selfie of Odessa Rae and Alexey Navalny in front of the suspect board.
Odessa Rae
Opinion: Putins nemesis has a spirit that can outlast any strongman
US actions overseas are not immune to the political divisions seen in Capitol Hill. In this case, the hard right has overshadowed moderate voices within the GOP, leading to resistance against Democrats' support for sending military aid to Ukraine. Recent polls by the Pew Research Center found that 48% of Republicans and Republican-leaning Independents believe the US has already provided too much support for Ukraine.
Former President Donald Trump's remarks about Putin and his claims of being able to quickly end the war have further ignited the situation. His rhetoric may bolster Putin's belief that he can remain steadfast in the face of Ukraine's struggle, especially if Trump were to be re-elected or if Congress remains deadlocked.
Sign up now for our free weekly newsletter! Finally, Putin is undoubtedly aware that American culture has a short attention span. In this era of never-ending social media feeds, Americans have a fleeting interest in news stories. Despite serious crises on the horizon, the odds are that Americans will quickly turn their attention to the next big thing as soon as a new report or viral video emerges. Politicians in the US who are caught in controversy have learned to take advantage of this by refusing to step down and choosing instead to weather the storm until the public moves on to something else.
Sign up for CNN Opinions newsletter
Join us on Twitter and Facebook
When it comes to foreign policy, gaining long-term support for an initiative overseas can be a major challenge for presidents. In the past, policymakers could effectively emphasize urgency by opposing communism, but today there are few universal principles that can have the same impact. The influence of the White House is also less powerful in an era where information is fragmented and decentralized. Partisan media outlets further complicate matters, as much of the news is filtered through a specific political lens.
Addressing the nation during the Cuban Missile Crisis or the Cold War was once a way for presidents like John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan to capture the public's attention. However, in today's digital age, these messages can easily get lost in the sea of online information. Even when they do get seen, much of the public is likely to quickly move on to something else.
The approval of military aid for Ukraine holds great significance, offering Democrats and Republicans the chance to refute Putin and show the world that the US is committed to supporting crucial foreign policy objectives for the long haul. It's not just Putin who will be observing, but also other nations who are eager to see the US follow through on its promises to stand by its allies.
