Sign up for free to receive a version of this story in CNN Business’ Nightcap newsletter, as it appeared there.
Elon Musk is well-known for his skepticism towards charity. Instead, he chooses to concentrate on his for-profit ventures, believing they will bring about more significant and transformative changes for the world.
As the CEO of Tesla, Elon Musk claimed to have made a significant impact on the environment, stating that he has done more than any other individual on Earth. This statement was made in an interview with the New York Times last year, and it appears that he genuinely believes it to be true.
In a recent incident, Musk criticized MacKenzie Scott, the philanthropist who divorced Jeff Bezos in 2019, for her charitable contributions. He went as far as to suggest that "super rich ex-wives who hate their former spouse" are a reason for the downfall of Western Civilization. The post was made on X and was later deleted.
Despite publicly criticizing non-profit work, Musk did establish a charitable foundation in 2001. It does provide financial support, although sporadically. However, the foundation seems to align with Musk's overall negative attitude towards non-profit organizations, fueling criticism from those who view him as more focused on gaining power than making a positive impact.
The Musk Foundation’s giving record has been described as “haphazard and largely self-serving” by a New York Times analysis. The non-profit operates without any full-time staff, only a board consisting of Musk and two volunteers. In recent years, it has not met the minimum required by law to maintain his tax breaks.
While there is no legal obligation for billionaires to donate to charity, American tax laws offer attractive incentives for them to do so.
Musk was able to reduce his $11 billion tax bill for 2021 by donating $5.7 billion to the Musk Foundation, as reported by the Times.
According to Amir Pasic, dean of the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, the tax system supports and promotes philanthropy among individuals with ultra-high net worth. Creating a foundation allows individuals to have some control over how the funds are distributed.
In Musk’s case, he gave millions of dollars to Cameron County, Texas, as reported by the Times. This decision came shortly after a SpaceX rocket explosion scattered shrapnel across the area. Additionally, he donated to two schools - one located within a SpaceX compound and another built near a housing complex for employees.
Pasic described Elon Musk as someone who is pushing the boundaries of unconventional philanthropic methods.
Editor's P/S:
Elon Musk's disdain for traditional charity and his focus on his for-profit ventures raise ethical concerns. While he claims to make a significant impact through his businesses, his skepticism towards non-profits and his haphazard charitable giving practices suggest a narrow and self-serving approach. The tax incentives that encourage billionaires to donate to charity should be re-evaluated to ensure that the funds are genuinely used for social good, rather than personal tax savings or self-promotion.
Musk's criticism of MacKenzie Scott's philanthropy, suggesting a misogynistic and retaliatory motive, further highlights his questionable values. His actions and statements demonstrate a lack of understanding of the transformative power of genuine philanthropy and its role in addressing systemic challenges. True philanthropy should be driven by a desire to make a positive impact on society, not by personal agenda or financial gain.