Setting the Record Straight: Director Clarifies Priscilla's Elvis Presley Depiction without Vilification

Article Overview

Sofia Coppola clarifies that she "never wanted to vilify" Elvis in the film Priscilla, which focuses on Priscilla Presley's perspective on their relationship.

The film has garnered praise for its depiction of a first love that evolves into a toxic relationship, but it has faced criticism from the Elvis estate for its inaccurate portrayal of Graceland. The estate is also likely displeased with the movie's portrayal of the age difference between Elvis and Priscilla, as well as his substance abuse, infidelity, and emotional abuse. Coppola's intention was to faithfully present Priscilla's narrative.

In a recent interview with Total Film (via GamesRadar+), director Sofia Coppola addressed the portrayal of Elvis Presley in her film Priscilla, stating that she never intended to villainize him. The movie, which is based on Priscilla Presley's memoir Elvis and Me, primarily follows her perspective in her relationship with the iconic King of Rock and Roll. The performances of Cailee Spaeny and Jacob Elordi have received positive reviews, although there are critics, such as the Elvis estate, who have raised concerns about the film's depiction of Elvis. Coppola had extensive discussions with Priscilla Presley in order to accurately represent her side of the story.

The Priscilla Movie Backlash Explained

I had extensive conversations with her during the preparation phase, as she made herself readily available. It was of utmost importance for me that she felt content and satisfied with the outcome, ensuring that it truly reflected her intended message. Thus, finding the appropriate balance became quite a challenge: how could I create what I had in mind while simultaneously respecting her and portraying her story accurately? My intention was never to vilify [Elvis]. There were delightful moments shared between them, and they genuinely cared for one another, but there were also darker moments. Striking the right equilibrium was crucial so as not to overwhelm the narrative in either direction. I consciously avoided allowing the interference of other opinions to cloud my judgment. My sole focus remained on presenting her story genuinely.

Priscilla's portrayal of first love, intertwined with fame, has garnered positive reviews. However, once the film was announced, the Elvis estate criticized it as "horrific" due to its inaccurate portrayal of Graceland. In contrast, Priscilla Presley, the executive producer, holds a different view and has supported Coppola's film. The movie offers her perspective, highlighted by Spaeny's captivating performance, as it delves into a toxic relationship that eventually leads to heartbreak and isolation.

There are numerous other potential reasons for the disapproval of the Priscilla movie by the Elvis estate, with the significant age difference between them taking precedence. When Elvis was 24 years old, he began dating Priscilla, who was only 14 at the time. Coppola's film doesn't shy away from acknowledging this fact, which has likely raised concerns about tarnishing the late icon's image. Furthermore, the movie portrays his struggles with substance abuse, infidelity, and emotional mistreatment – all of which Priscilla discusses in her memoir. As a result, the film is far less idealizing compared to Baz Luhrmann's Elvis, although Coppola's primary objective was to honestly present Priscilla's story.

Priscilla is now playing in theaters everywhere.

Source: Total Film (via GamesRadar+)

Editor's P/S

As a Gen Z netizen, I have mixed feelings about the movie "Priscilla" and its portrayal of Elvis Presley. On the one hand, I appreciate that the film sheds light on the complex and often toxic relationship between Elvis and Priscilla Presley. The film does not shy away from depicting the darker aspects of Elvis's personality, including his substance abuse, infidelity, and emotional abuse. This is an important part of the story that should not be ignored.

On the other hand, I am concerned that the film may paint Elvis in too negative of a light. While it is important to acknowledge his flaws, it is also important to remember that he was a complex and multifaceted individual. The film could have done a better job of showing the positive aspects of Elvis's personality, such as his charisma, talent, and generosity.

Overall, I think "Priscilla" is a well-made and thought-provoking film. It is a valuable contribution to the ongoing conversation about Elvis Presley and his legacy. However, I encourage viewers to keep in mind that the film is only one perspective on a very complex story.