Royal expert Christopher Andersen believes that Prince William's recent title change is a huge insult to Prince Harry. Andersen expressed his view during an interview with We, where he praised 39-year-old Harry as a valuable member of the royal family. They discussed Harry's strained relationship with King Charles III and William.
Anderson mentioned that all Harry wants is to have a part-time role and help out while the King and Princess of Wales are dealing with cancer. He expressed disappointment that they are not willing to involve Harry or Meghan, seeing it as a missed chance to come together during this crisis.
He also noted that this could have been a great chance for Charles and Kate Middleton to mend their relationship with Harry. However, the focus seems to be on giving William a title that was originally meant for Harry.
“The royal family is very good at exiling people and saying, you’re dead to me and I’m afraid that’s what’s happening,” Andersen added.
Royal Expert Suggests Timing of Prince Williams New Title Is a Tremendous Insult to Prince Harry
Earlier this week, Buckingham Palace announced that Prince William would be appointed Colonel-in-Chief of the Army Air Corps. This role was originally expected to go to Prince Harry, but he stepped down from his royal duties in 2020. The Palace also confirmed on the same day that Prince Charles would not meet up with Harry while his youngest son was in the U.K.
Anderson added that it was a double blow for Harry. The King not only declined to meet him but also decided to give one of Harry's titles to William. This title was the Colonel-in-Chief of the Royal Air Corps, and it was going to be made into a significant event.
According to Anderson, Harry is the only member of the royal family who has experienced combat. He believes that Harry deserves the different military ranks that he is entitled to.
“The one true army hero in the family is Harry,” he added. “It’s really quite sad.”
Andersen also reflected on why the King might have skipped out on meeting up with Harry.
The author believed that it was important for him to meet with him, even though the Garden Party at Buckingham Palace coincided with Harry's trip. They felt that a brief meeting could have been significant and could have portrayed a positive image of improving relationships within the royal family.
Editor's P/S:
The recent title change, bestowing the Colonel-in-Chief of the Army Air Corps to Prince William, has ignited a storm of controversy. Royal expert Christopher Andersen views it as a blatant insult to Prince Harry, who was expected to inherit the role. Andersen highlights Harry's military service and combat experience, making him the most qualified candidate within the royal family. The decision to give this title to William instead of Harry is seen as a deliberate snub, further straining the relationship between the brothers.
Andersen also expresses disappointment that King Charles III declined to meet with Harry during his recent visit to the UK. This missed opportunity, coupled with the title change, suggests a pattern of exclusion and resentment towards Harry. Andersen believes that the royal family's reluctance to engage with Harry is a missed chance for reconciliation and unity, particularly during a time when the family is facing challenges with cancer. The expert's comments underscore the ongoing tensions within the British monarchy and raise questions about the future of Harry's relationship with the institution.