Queen Camilla's Ethical Fashion Choice: No More Animal Pelts in Wardrobe
Following Buckingham Palace's statement, Queen Camilla has made a notable decision to refrain from adding any new furs to her wardrobe. A letter to an animal rights group confirms her commitment to ethical fashion choices and animal welfare, setting a positive example for sustainable fashion practices.
Buckingham Palace recently sent a letter to an animal rights group, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), confirming that Queen Camilla will no longer purchase clothes made with animal pelts. The letter stated, "Her Majesty will not acquire any new fur garments." However, it is still uncertain whether the Queen will continue to wear fur items already in her wardrobe.
Queen Elizabeth II's daughter-in-law has decided to follow in her late mother-in-law's footsteps by also refusing to purchase new fur products, a stance the Queen took in 2019.
The decision was made after the palace received a letter from PETA in April. In the letter, Elisa Allen, vice president of PETA's UK programs and operations, outlined the cruel practices used in the fur industry and its negative impact on the environment.
In a statement sent to CNN, the charity’s founder, Ingrid Newkirk, expressed her excitement about the news. She praised Queen Camilla for being a true queen by joining the 95% of British people who choose not to wear animal fur, as shown by polls.
Queen Elizabeth II at The Guards' Chapel in London, England, on February 22, 2019.
Queen Elizabeth II at The Guards' Chapel in London, England, on February 22, 2019.
Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty Images
Related article
The Queen has ditched real fur for fake, according to her dresser
Queen Elizabeth II's senior dresser, Angela Kelly, revealed the decision in her book "The Other Side of the Coin: The Queen, the Dresser and the Wardrobe." Kelly stated that starting in 2019, fake fur will be used to ensure the Queen stays warm during engagements in cold weather.
PETA has launched a "fur amnesty program" urging owners to donate their fur items. The donated furs are then distributed to the homeless, refugees, and individuals in war-torn regions to provide warmth during the winter months. The organization emphasizes that while the suffering of animals for fur cannot be undone, repurposing old furs can benefit those in need.
Editor's P/S:
As an advocate for animal welfare, I applaud Queen Camilla's decision to join the growing movement against the use of animal pelts in fashion. Her commitment to compassion and ethical practices sets an exemplary standard for others to follow. The fur industry's cruelty and environmental impact are undeniable, and the Queen's stance sends a powerful message that this inhumane practice has no place in a modern and civilized society.
It is encouraging to see the royal family embrace progressive values and promote kindness towards animals. The Queen's decision aligns with the growing public sentiment against fur, as evidenced by polls showing that the majority of Britons reject its use. By refusing to purchase new fur garments, Queen Camilla not only demonstrates her personal compassion but also aligns herself with the ethical choices of her subjects.
