Key Points from the Controversial Decision Upholding DA Fani Willis in the Trump Election Subversion Case

Judge Scott McAfee has given the green light for Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis to move forward with the election subversion case involving Donald Trump. However, before proceeding, Willis will need to dismiss special prosecutor Nathan Wade. This decision comes after a tumultuous two months during which Willis and Wade faced scrutiny for their romantic relationship.

Former President Donald Trump and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.

Former President Donald Trump and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.

Getty Images

Related live-story

Judge rules Fani Willis can stay on Trump’s Georgia election case

Willis scored a technical legal victory, giving her the ability to proceed with prosecuting Trump and 14 others with her full team.

However, McAfee's 23-page opinion strongly criticized the district attorney's actions. It is still uncertain if Trump will go to trial before November for his post-2020 election activities.

McAfee decided that either Wade or Willis needed to step down from the case due to doubts about their honesty regarding their relationship. Here are the key points from the ruling on Friday:

Willis survived the disqualification challenge, but her case and the DA have been affected. The detour involving her relationship with Wade has left a stain on her case. This could impact potential jurors who are familiar with the episode and the broader public who will decide whether to bring Trump back to the White House in November.

McAfee criticized Willis and Wade's relationship, calling it a result of "bad choices." He noted that according to Georgia law, making bad choices repeatedly does not constitute an actual conflict.

Their relationship became a focal point of the case in January when co-defendant Mike Roman filed a motion to disqualify Willis due to allegations of an "improper" relationship.

During several hearings, McAfee listened to testimony regarding their relationship and the payments Wade made for trips they went on together. The defendants claimed this showed that the district attorney financially gained from their relationship. However, Willis countered by stating that she had reimbursed Wade in cash.

Video Ad Feedback

'This thing smells': CNN breaks down judge's wording in Fani Willis ruling

02:15

• Source:

CNN

Both Willis and Wade testified in court. Willis made a remarkable entrance, expressing her eagerness to testify and responding indignantly to the allegations made against her by the lawyers.

The judge, in his ruling on Friday, criticized Willis' passionate testimony as "unprofessional."

The judge made it clear that the Court does not support the District Attorney's unprofessional behavior during the hearing, despite the finding.

Trump continues to secure victories before his trial.

Friday's ruling is a partial victory for the former president as he tries to delay his four criminal trials and push back against the prosecutors who have charged him.

Trump's lawyers have managed to delay all four criminal trials, which could prevent the former president from hitting the campaign trail this year.

Trump’s attempt to overturn the election results is currently paused in Washington as the Supreme Court deals with his claims of immunity. Meanwhile, in Florida, a new trial date is expected to be set soon for the case involving classified documents, which is being overseen by a judge appointed by Trump.

Over in New York, where Trump was facing his first criminal trial, the Manhattan District Attorney’s office has agreed to postpone the trial by 30 days. This decision was made after the US Attorney’s Office provided them with tens of thousands of new pages of evidence.

Trump's defense team is not just relying on delaying tactics. They are also working on diverting attention from Trump's many criminal charges by attacking the prosecutors and creating doubt in the legal system.

McAfee pointed out that any perceived conflict can shake the public's trust in the legal system. If not addressed, it weakens the credibility and authority of the judicial branch.

McAfee mentioned that there were still uncertainties regarding the timeline of the relationship between Wade and Willis. The defendants claimed that the relationship started before Wade was hired in 2021. They also questioned the payments made by Wade when they went on trips together.

He concluded that there was not enough evidence to prove the accusations against them.

According to McAfee, doubts about the honesty of the District Attorney and her chosen lead SADA regarding the timeline of their relationship add to the perception of wrongdoing, emphasizing the importance of taking appropriate steps to address it.

But McAfee also pointed out that simply dismissing the indictment is not enough to clear up the financial cloud of wrongdoing and possible dishonesty in this case.

Fulton County Superior Judge Scott McAfee was in court for a hearing in the case of the State of Georgia v. Donald John Trump at the Fulton County Courthouse on March 1 in Atlanta.

Alex Slitz/Pool/Getty Images/File

Related article

READ: Fulton County judge’s decision allowing Fani Willis to continue prosecuting 2020 election interference case

McAfee pointed out that a key factor was that Willis’ testimony and the evidence showed that any financial gain from Wade was not a driving force for the District Attorney to pursue the case.

McAfee also mentioned that although Willis did not keep records of the payments she made to Wade for their vacation travels, her assertion that she reimbursed him in cash was not implausible.

“The Defendants have not presented sufficient evidence indicating that the expenses were not ‘roughly divided evenly,’” the judge wrote.

Will Wade stay or will he go?

McAfee emphasized on Friday that if Wade remained involved in the case, there would be concerns about potential biases affecting the outcome of the case against Trump and others.

The judge presented Willis with a decision to either step down herself or have Wade removed from the case. However, the best course of action is clear: if Willis chooses to withdraw her office from the case, it would be reassigned to Georgia’s Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council, a move that could jeopardize the progress of the complex racketeering case depending on the new assignee.

McAfee expressed concern that the District Attorney may not be making decisions independently, which could create doubt among outsiders. This perception will continue as long as Wade is involved in the case.

The judge criticized Wade for not revealing his connection with Willis during his divorce proceedings. This lack of transparency could lead to suspicions that he may still be hiding a financial or romantic relationship with Willis, despite their claims that it ended last year.

McAfee criticized Wade's unconvincing explanation for the incorrect questions he provided during his ongoing divorce proceedings. It suggests that Wade may be intentionally hiding his connection with the District Attorney. As the case progresses, it is possible that the public may question if financial transactions are still occurring, leading to potential benefits for the District Attorney, or if their romantic relationship has resumed.

McAfee also criticized Willis' speech and hinted that a gag order may be imposed in the future.

McAfee criticized the district attorney's actions and mentioned that Willis' comments at an Atlanta-area church in January regarding the case were "legally improper." McAfee also expressed concern about the possibility of a gag order being issued against Willis in the future.

Willis defended Wade during a speech earlier this year, saying he was being targeted because of his race. The defendants pointed to this January speech as evidence that Willis may be biased against them in the case involving Trump and his co-defendants.

Willis clarified in court documents that her remarks were not directed at the defendants, including Trump, in her election tampering case.

McAfee argued that the remarks were made well before the jury trial, so they would not prejudice the jury and would not impact the fairness of the trial. He stated, "The Court does not believe that these statements went too far to affect the defendants' right to a fair trial or warrant the disqualification of the District Attorney."

McAfee stated in his ruling on Friday that the actions were still legally incorrect. He expressed concern that making public comments could lead the District Attorney into risky territory.

Regarding the possibility of a gag order, the judge mentioned that it may be necessary to prevent the State from discussing the case in public to avoid biased publicity. However, he clarified that this specific motion was not currently under consideration by the Court.

CNN’s Devan Cole contributed to this report.

Editor's P/S:

The ongoing saga involving Fani Willis, Nathan Wade, and the election subversion case has raised ethical concerns and cast a shadow over the proceedings. Judge Scott McAfee's ruling highlights the delicate balance between justice and the perception of impropriety. While Willis has survived the disqualification challenge, the revelations about her relationship with Wade have left a stain on her case.

McAfee's criticism of Willis's testimony and her public comments suggest a growing concern about the potential for bias and conflict of interest. The judge's decision to give Willis the option to remove Wade or step down herself underscores the gravity of the situation. As the case progresses, the scrutiny of Willis's actions and the impartiality of the prosecution will only intensify. The public's trust in the legal system hinges on the integrity of those involved, and any perceived compromise of that integrity threatens the fair and just outcome of this high-profile case.