Roger Ebert's Misjudged Movies

Introduction

There are a number of movies that renowned film critic Roger Ebert panned when they were first released, but have since gone on to be considered classics and cult favorites. During his prolific career, Ebert established himself as an authoritative voice in film criticism through his thoughtful analysis and judgment of cinematic works. However, there were instances where his initial assessments of certain movies were out of step with the esteem and appreciation the films would garner over time.

David Spade and Chris Farley in Tommy Boy

Time has shown that the merits of some movies are revealed gradually. There are examples of movies dismissed in their day as lacking substance or artistry, only to be regarded as seminal entries in the medium years later thanks to newly recognized subtext or influence. While no critic can be expected to predict every film’s lasting significance, it is interesting to look back at selections from Ebert’s volumes of reviews and examine cases where his educated perspective failed to recognize qualities that allowed certain films to transcend early criticism and become classics.

Tommy Boy: From Harsh Review to Beloved Comedy Classic

When Tommy Boy was released in 1995, renowned film critic Roger Ebert gave the buddy comedy a harsh review, rating it just 1 out of 4 stars. He claimed “no character is funny” besides the villain played by Rob Lowe, and that the movie overall lacked any memorable lines or genuinely humorous moments. However, over time, Tommy Boy has become a beloved comedy classic thanks to Chris Farley's lovable and hilarious performance. Though sophisticated critics like Ebert may have seen the movie as vulgar and dull, its simplicity and heartfelt charm have allowed it to age incredibly well as a comedy cult favorite for Farley fans.

Hocus Pocus: Embracing Playful Absurdity

Giving a rating of just 1 out of 4 stars, Roger Ebert seemed immune to the quirky charm of Hocus Pocus. He likened watching it to attending a party where everyone is in on an inside joke that goes over your head. While there are some harsh realities rewatching Hocus Pocus 30 years later and the premise is admittedly silly, that is precisely what makes it appealing for so many to this day. What Ebert found lacking in coherent narrative and character development has been embraced as the film's strength, which is never taking itself too seriously and reveling in the playful absurdity.

Sarah, Mary and Winifred in their coven in Hocus Pocus 2