Priscilla Director's Discontent with Elvis Presley Estate Surfaces after Movie's Premiere

Article Overview

The depiction of Priscilla's real life with Elvis in the biopic has drawn criticism from the Elvis estate, which is protective of the Elvis brand.

The autobiography "Elvis and Me" sheds light on some of the negative aspects of Elvis' life, including his drug use and infidelity, which have the potential to tarnish his image.

Although Priscilla's portrayal in the movie doesn't leave much room for a positive perspective of Elvis, director Sofia Coppola remains committed to her depiction of Priscilla.

The director of the movie "Priscilla" is dissatisfied with Elvis' estate. The biopic chronicles the relationship between Priscilla and Elvis from their first meeting to the start of their divorce, and is based on Priscilla Presley's autobiography, "Elvis and Me." Initially released by A24 on October 27th, and later to a wider audience on November 3rd, the film has only earned $2 million thus far, in comparison to its $20 million budget.

Although director Sofia Coppola had the opportunity to collaborate closely with executive producer Priscilla Presley, the Elvis estate did not provide the same level of support for the movie. The portrayal of Priscilla's real-life experiences with Elvis has received significant criticism from the estate, particularly due to the depiction of Graceland, as well as the overall writing and direction. Speaking to Vogue, Coppola expressed her surprise at the estate's negative response. Refer to her quote below:

The Likely Grievances Of The Elvis Estate

I am unsure about the exact relationship between Priscilla and the estate, but considering her significant role in Elvis's story, I would have expected them to show her more respect. However, it seems that their primary concern is safeguarding the Elvis brand and they are not supportive of projects that they are unable to control. While I understand their perspective as business-oriented individuals, I have immense admiration for Elvis as an artist. In my film, I have attempted to depict him with depth and sensitivity. Moreover, Priscilla's book has already been in circulation for quite some time, so I believed that my film would not hold too many surprises. These stories have been accessible for years, and honestly, I could have delved into much darker elements, but I chose to approach it with a delicate touch. I believe their intention is simply to protect the Elvis brand or something along those lines. Nonetheless, I will direct my focus towards Priscilla.

Priscilla's movie, which delves into her relationship with Elvis, presents several reasons for the opposition from the Elvis estate. The potentially problematic nature of a film centred around Elvis' wife stems from the fact that their relationship began when he was 24 and she was only 14, a sensitive detail that could stain Elvis' image if made widely known. Furthermore, the autobiography also reveals darker aspects of the iconic star's life, deepening the concerns of the estate.

Elvis and Me, originally released in 1985, later transformed into a television movie in 1988.

The book paints a picture of Elvis as someone who places high demands on Priscilla and exerts controlling behavior over her. It also delves into his escalating dependency on drugs, which he persuades Priscilla to partake in, and explores his inclination towards infidelity. At one point, Elvis even prefers to keep Priscilla confined to Graceland, ensuring she remains under his watchful eye and authority.

The Elvis estate's opposition to a film that presents Elvis in a negative light is to be expected. Priscilla's tragic outcome offers little opportunity for a positive interpretation of Elvis, making it a less favorable portrayal than what was portrayed in the Austin Butler-led Elvis. Despite the disapproval from the Elvis estate, Coppola is confident in Priscilla's portrayal of Elvis' wife.

Editor's P/S

As a passionate fan of Elvis Presley, I have mixed feelings about the recent movie "Priscilla" and the controversy surrounding its depiction of Elvis' life. On one hand, I understand the Elvis estate's desire to protect the King's image and legacy. Elvis was a beloved figure to millions of people, and it's natural for his estate to want to preserve his memory in a positive light.

On the other hand, I believe that it's important for biopics to be accurate and honest, even if that means portraying the subject in a less than flattering light. Elvis was a complex and flawed individual, and I think it's important for fans to see all sides of him, both the good and the bad.

I think Sofia Coppola did a good job of balancing these two competing interests in her film. She didn't shy away from the darker aspects of Elvis' life, but she also showed his humanity and vulnerability. I think the film is a valuable contribution to the Elvis Presley story, and I'm glad that it was made.