GOP representative implies using bombs on Gaza for swift resolution, invoking Nagasaki and Hiroshima

GOP representative implies using bombs on Gaza for swift resolution, invoking Nagasaki and Hiroshima

Republican Congressman Tim Walberg clarifies his remarks, stating he used a metaphor when suggesting using bombs on Gaza similar to Nagasaki and Hiroshima for a quick resolution.

Republican Rep. Tim Walberg clarified that he was speaking metaphorically when he seemed to imply that bombs should be dropped on Gaza like Nagasaki and Hiroshima to quickly resolve the situation. Walberg, who represents southern Michigan, made the WWII-era reference during a town hall discussion with constituents on March 25 while advocating for the discontinuation of US aid to Gaza.

Walberg, a GOP congressman, recently addressed a question from a constituent in a video posted on social media. The constituent was curious about why American dollars were being used to construct a temporary pier for humanitarian assistance in Gaza.

In response to the inquiry, Walberg expressed his opinion that providing additional humanitarian aid to Gaza was unnecessary. He firmly stated, "I don't think we should be spending any more on humanitarian aid." This viewpoint comes despite the UN's warning of an impending famine in the northern region of Gaza and reports indicating that 70% of the population is currently experiencing severe hunger.

He went on to say that it should be similar to what happened in Nagasaki and Hiroshima, to get it done quickly.

In a complete transcript of Walberg's remarks, shared with CNN by his office, the GOP congressman also suggested applying the same strategy in Ukraine to swiftly defeat Putin.

In Ukraine, the focus should be on defeating Putin swiftly. According to the transcript, instead of just 80% of resources being used for humanitarian purposes, it should be increased to 80-100% to combat Russia if that is the goal.

In a statement shared on X, Walberg clarified that he was not proposing the use of nuclear weapons to resolve the conflicts, despite mentioning the US using atomic bombs on Japanese cities to end World War II.

Growing up during the Cold War, I am strongly against the use of nuclear weapons. In a recent video, I used a metaphor to explain why it is important for Israel and Ukraine to end their wars quickly, without endangering American troops. My intention was to emphasize that ending the wars swiftly would save innocent lives.

I believe that if Hamas and Russia surrender soon, it will make it easier to move forward. Despite the misinterpretation of my message due to the lack of context in the video clip, I want to reaffirm my support for these beliefs and for our allies.

Editor's P/S:

The remarks made by Republican Rep. Tim Walberg are deeply concerning and reflect a dangerous lack of understanding of the consequences of nuclear warfare. Walberg's suggestion that