Explosive Dynamics: Unveiling the True Impact of Threats against Jim Jordan Holdouts in the GOP

Threats arise when rationality is no longer effective.

The unsuccessful attempt to replace Republican Rep. Jim Jordan as House Speaker exposed alarming incidents of the growing acceptance of violent threats within the GOP under Trump's leadership.

Following Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks' decision to change her vote and oppose Jordan, she announced that she had received "credible death threats and a relentless stream of intimidating phone calls."

Rep. Ken Buck of Colorado has also reported receiving death threats. Rep. Steve Womack of Arkansas explains that the intention behind these threats is to continually attack and undermine members who hold opposing views, attempting to force them into submission.

Joe Biden, the President of the United States, addresses the nation from the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C. He discusses his strategies regarding the Israel-Hamas conflict, providing humanitarian aid in Gaza, and offering ongoing support to Ukraine in their conflict with Russia. The prime-time address took place on October 19, 2023, with Jonathan Ernst capturing the event as part of the pool photography team for Reuters.

Opinion: Biden's week filled with success, while the world suffered a setback.

This goes against the principles of deliberative democracy and functioning politics within a civilized society. (Jim Jordan, who withdrew his candidacy for speaker on Friday due to a secret ballot revealing his loss of support from fellow Republicans, strongly condemned the death threats, stating, "It is simply unacceptable.")

One specific voicemail, addressed to the spouse of an unidentified right-wing legislator and showcased solely on our colleague Jake Tapper's program, provides a vivid depiction of the underlying issues that have contributed to the Republican Party's current predicament.

The caller, evidently upset, unleashes a vehement rant that warrants a thorough analysis.

The caller's aggressive tone and offensive language are evident from the start. They begin by verbally attacking the anonymous congressman, whom they refer to as a "pig," for publicly opposing Jordan. The voicemail then takes a concerning turn, as the caller suggests that the congressman's decision was influenced by the "deep state," indicating their alignment with right-wing media.

However, the caller's threats escalate significantly. They boldly declare their intention to relentlessly follow and monitor the recipient, saying, "We're going to be up your ass. F--king nonstop." They claim to be part of Antifa and state that they will employ tactics similar to those used by the left.

Overall, the caller's angry tirade, dehumanizing insults, conspiracy theories, and intimidation tactics are deeply unsettling.

This content reveals a recurring pattern of projection, where baseless claims are made to deny that the attack on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021 was orchestrated by conservative Trump supporters. Instead, they attribute it to the leftist group Antifa. Even members of the Proud Boys boasted about disguising themselves as Antifa prior to the attack.

The fear-mongering around Antifa has become widely accepted, as conservatives frequently utilize the group or other left-leaning figures as a scapegoat or diversion from the violent actions committed by the right. This tactic, known as "aggressive defensiveness," is commonly employed.

On Tuesday, October 17, 2023, Rep. Jim Jordan, a Republican from Ohio, listens attentively after an unsuccessful first ballot as Republicans attempt to elect him as the new House speaker. Their endeavors take place at the Capitol in Washington.

Alex Brandon/AP

Opinion: Jim Jordans pressure campaign backfired

It is not the only irrational mind-boggler. The individual making the call continuously uses a derogatory term against the congressman in reference to his (*checks notes*) spouse, demonstrating an insecure mindset that disguises itself as extreme masculinity, targeting those who hold more progressive views as being gay and therefore weak in this distorted perspective.

But that's not all. The fervent threat-maker also accuses the congressman of being a "warmongering piece of s--t," indicating a possible reflection of the post-Trump isolationist tendencies found on the far-right. However, in the very next moment, he claims that the ongoing conflict in Israel gives rise to a moral imperative to promote a Jim Jordan speakership.

The fear escalates with the threat of doxxing, as the caller claims to be sharing the wife's personal contact details online, aiming to subject her to further harassment. This manipulation tactic stems from a disingenuous individual who seeks to assert their authority by intimidating those who hold opposing views.

Any notion that this was an isolated and irrational individual, unaffected by any political bias, is shattered by the caller's insistence on the congressman supporting "Jim Jordan or a more conservative candidate." Clearly, this caller has distinct right-wing ideological expectations.

If the wife is unsuccessful in persuading the congressman to change his vote, he threatens her with unimaginable sexual assault. This cynical tactic resembles the justification used by those defending the events of January 6th, when Trump suggested that the armed crowd should peacefully march on the Capitol. It is a legalistic diversion meant to distract from the clear intention.

The need to examine all the elements of this threat-scape arises from its connection to the dynamic and influential far-right media ecosystem. The various components are woven together with the aim of instilling fear and coercing individuals into yielding more power to the far-right.

In this 2008 photo, the US House of Representatives chamber is seen in Washington, DC.

Brendan Hoffman/Getty Images

The resolution for the House speaker turmoil

It proved unsuccessful on this occasion. However, it has been successful previously. Following the assault on the Capitol, a Republican congressman confided in a colleague that he was apprehensive about endorsing the election certification, despite his own well-founded belief in Biden's legitimate victory, due to concerns for the safety of his family.

Republicans were driven by similar fears in Trump's second impeachment, causing them to not vote according to their beliefs. Former Congresswoman Liz Cheney stated in an interview with CNN that there were members who expressed concerns for their personal safety and, in some cases, even their lives, during the vote for impeachment.

Therefore, although the attempt to pressure support for Jim Jordan was unsuccessful, the efforts to normalize threats of violence continue. Rep. Scott Perry of Pennsylvania, who was found by the House select committee on January 6 to have sent text messages confirming his involvement in the plan to overturn the 2020 election results, disregarded the death threats as a diversionary tactic.

Jake Sherman, the founder of Punchbowl News, disclosed that Rep. Warren Davidson of Ohio, a staunch supporter of Jordan, privately stated that the responsibility for the death threats received by fellow members of Congress did not lie with Jordan. Instead, Rep. Davidson implied that these threats were a consequence of their own actions in opposing him. Sign up now to receive our complimentary weekly newsletter.

Sign up for CNN Opinions newsletter

Join us on Twitter and Facebook

The discourse within the Republican Party has been profoundly shaped by Donald Trump's rhetoric, resulting in a political climate characterized by anger and anxiety. Right-wing media contributes to this by perpetuating a worldview that fuels the listeners' addiction to these negative emotions. Consequently, the GOP has been transformed, as described by Utah Sen. Mitt Romney, into a party that embraces authoritarian tendencies.

This toxic environment often gives rise to threats of violence, instilling fear in elected officials who risk not only physical harm but also the loss of their authority. Additionally, they face the secondary threat of losing their partisan primaries if they fail to align with the party's base.

This is not sustainable. However, stepping forward and refusing to be intimidated is a crucial move towards ending this highly divisive political climate. It is an encouraging indication that Jordan was unable to secure the support of a majority in the Republican caucus when the vote was conducted secretly. Bullies only respond to strength, and making threats is essentially an acknowledgement of weakness, which can be effectively countered with moral conviction and a steadfast commitment to protect our democracy.