Gillian Anderson Thinks King Charles and Kate Middleton Should Get A Break During Cancer Battles
Gillian Anderson, King Charles and Kate Middleton Getty Images (3)
Gillian Anderson, known for her roles in two projects centered around the royal family, believes that the personal struggles of King Charles III and Princess Kate Middleton should not be portrayed for public consumption.
In an interview with Entertainment Tonight published on Thursday, March 28, Anderson, who is 55 years old, expressed her opinion, saying, "Oh, no. I think it probably ended at the right spot. It was getting too close to present day. It’s much easier when it was further in the past, and I think people didn’t have, necessarily, a direct relationship with the people on the screen."
Anderson, known for her role as Margaret Thatcher on season 4 of The Crown, recently wrapped up the Netflix drama series. Spanning six seasons, the show depicted Queen Elizabeth II's historic reign as monarch and concluded in 2022. The final episodes featured a young Prince William meeting his future wife Kate at college in the early 2000s.
Moving on to her next project, Anderson is now taking on the role of British journalist Emily Maitlis in the upcoming Netflix film, Scoop. The movie is inspired by Prince Andrew's controversial BBC interview addressing allegations of sexual misconduct. Despite denying the claims and settling out of court, Prince Andrew, now 64, has stepped down from his royal duties and lost his honorary titles.
Anderson is adamant that a movie or TV show should not focus on the health issues of Prince Charles and Kate, despite her involvement in projects related to the British royals.
Gillian Anderson Thinks King Charles and Kate Middleton Should Get A Break During Cancer Battles
Anderson told ET that it's important to respect Kate Middleton, Prince William, King Charles, and Queen Camilla's need for privacy during this time. He emphasized the importance of giving them space to process the recent news and to show them compassion as fellow human beings.
In February, Buckingham Palace announced that Charles had received a cancer diagnosis, which was found during a procedure for his prostate. The specific type of cancer was not disclosed by the palace, but royal reporter Omid Scobie stated that it was not related to his prostate.
A month later, Kate also shared that she had been diagnosed with cancer, but did not specify the type.
The Princess of Wales shared in a video from Kensington Palace that she had major abdominal surgery in London in January. Initially, it was believed that her condition was non-cancerous, but tests later revealed the presence of cancer. Following the successful surgery, her medical team recommended preventative chemotherapy, which she has started in the early stages.
Both Charles and Kate have been limiting their public appearances while undergoing treatment. The king has had only a few audiences at the palaces and is expected to attend Easter mass on March 31. Meanwhile, Kate and William, 41, are reportedly not planning on attending the church services.
Editor's P/S:
Gillian Anderson's perspective on the privacy of the British royal family is both respectful and compassionate. She recognizes the need for the public to be informed about the monarchy, but she also emphasizes the importance of respecting their personal struggles and giving them space to heal. Her own experiences playing historical figures on screen have given her insights into the challenges of balancing public curiosity with the privacy of individuals in the public eye.
The health issues of King Charles III and Princess Kate Middleton are deeply personal matters, and it is understandable that they would wish to keep them private. The public's interest in their well-being is well-intentioned, but it is important to remember that they are also human beings with the same rights to privacy as anyone else. The media and the public should respect their wishes and allow them the time and space to focus on their health and recovery without the added pressure of constant scrutiny.