Exploring 5 Crucial Events in the O.J. Simpson Murder Trial: From 'The Glove' to Denise Brown's Testimony

Feature Key Moments From OJ Simpson Murder Trial

RICK MEYER/AFP via Getty Images

The trial of O.J. Simpson held the nation's attention. Following his arrest and charges for the murders of his ex-wife Nicole Brown and her friend Ronald Goldman in June 1994, the trial was televised for all to see. Simpson, who passed away from prostate cancer on Wednesday, April 10, maintained intense public interest throughout the proceedings.

Often known as "The Trial of the Century," this almost year-long case kept viewers at home glued to their screens, and finally concluded with a verdict on October 3, 1995 that continues to spark debate.

Simpson, a former athlete who had transitioned into acting, had a top-notch legal team representing him, which consisted of Johnnie Cochran, Robert Shapiro, Alan Dershowitz, and Robert Kardashian.

On the opposite side of the courtroom, Marcia Clark, Christopher Darden, and William Hodgman stood representing the state.

This infamous trial has gone down in history as one of the most scandalous and unbelievable events in modern American legal history. To discover the five key moments that shaped the trial, continue reading.

The Testimony of Denise Brown

Denise Brown Key Moments From OJ Simpson Murder Trial

POOL/AFP via Getty Images

Denise, the sister of Nicole, took the stand for two days of testimony in February 1995.

Denise shared in court that her sister had endured years of abuse from Simpson. She described instances of Simpson throwing Nicole against a wall and kicking her out of their home during the 1980s.

Additionally, Denise remembered a time when Simpson publicly humiliated Nicole by calling her "a fat pig" while she was pregnant. She also recounted a disturbing incident in 1989 when Simpson grabbed Nicole's private area in front of others, proudly declaring, "This belongs to me."

Throughout her testimony, she was clearly upset and often in tears. She shared details painting a negative image of her sister's marriage to Simpson, which had ended in 1992, just two years before her tragic death.

During the cross examination, defense attorney Shapiro questioned Denise about her struggles with alcohol, to which she admitted.

In effect, Simpson’s defense team attempted to use Denise’s sobriety issues to undermine the validity of her testimony, which some critics saw as a harsh tactic.

The Mark Fuhrman Debacle

Mark Fuhrman Key Moments From OJ Simpson Murder Trial

POOL/AFP via Getty Images

In March 1995, former LAPD detective Fuhrman testified in court, marking a significant moment in the trial. He played a key role in finding crucial evidence at the crime scene, such as the well-known leather glove. Simpson’s defense team claimed that Fuhrman had planted the glove himself.

One of the most shocking moments during the trial occurred when defense lawyers played recordings of Fuhrman using racist language in the past, contradicting his earlier denial on the witness stand. This led the defense to argue that Fuhrman was not a trustworthy witness and had lied under oath.

When questioned about planting evidence, Fuhrman famously chose not to respond, citing his Fifth Amendment privilege. Many believe that Fuhrman's damaging testimony was a key factor in Simpson's eventual acquittal.

The Glove

Glove Key Moments From OJ Simpson Murder Trial

On June 15, 1995, Darden presented a key piece of evidence that would go down in history. This evidence was a bloody glove found on Simpson's property, which led to him being charged with the murders. During the trial, prosecutor Darden shocked co-counsel Clark by asking Simpson to try on the gloves in the courtroom.

Darden wanted to show that the gloves belonged to Simpson by proving they fit him. However, when Simpson tried to put them on, he seemed to have difficulty. Darden attributed this to Simpson's arthritis, claiming he hadn't taken his medication, causing swelling and inflammation in his hands.

The following day, Cochran consulted the Los Angeles County Jail doctor and found out that Simpson had indeed taken his medication, contradicting Darden's claim.

Ultimately, the gloves became a focal point of the entire trial, leading to Cochran’s notorious line: “If it doesn’t fit, you must acquit.”

The Closing Arguments

Johnnie Cochran and Christopher Darden Key Moments From OJ Simpson Murder Trial

Lee Celano/WireImage

One year after jury selection started, closing arguments for Simpson's murder trial began on September 26, 1995. The prosecution mainly targeted the police, trying to counter the belief that law enforcement was trying to set up Simpson.

During Darden's closing argument, Cochran and his team objected 71 times, but Judge Lance Ito overruled them 69 times. The defense team kept trying to interrupt Darden's statements in order to lessen their impact.

During his closing argument, Cochran focused on criticizing the LAPD for alleged misconduct. He likened Fuhrman to Adolf Hitler, labeling him as "a genocidal racist, a perjurer, America’s worst nightmare, and the personification of evil."

Cochran urged the jury to use their verdict as a way to communicate a message to the police.

The Acquittal

Acquittal Key Moments From OJ Simpson Murder Trial

On Tuesday, October 3, 1995, at 10:07 a.m., Simpson was found not guilty of both murder charges. The jury made a surprising decision, taking only four hours to reach their verdict. Approximately 100 million people tuned in to watch or listen to the reading of the verdict.

In 1996, the parents of Brown and Goldman took legal action against Simpson and he was found responsible for the deaths of the two victims. The families were given $33.5 million in damages. Unfortunately, Simpson declared bankruptcy soon after the trial.

In October 2008, the Goldman family revealed that they had only received 1 percent of the money owed to them by Simpson.

Editor's P/S:

The O.J. Simpson trial remains a captivating and controversial event in American history. The trial's intense public scrutiny and dramatic twists and turns have left a lasting impact on our legal system and cultural landscape. While Simpson's acquittal may have raised questions about the fairness and effectiveness of our judicial process, it also highlighted the importance of due process and the presumption of innocence.

The trial showcased the power of media and public opinion, with the jury's verdict being heavily influenced by the relentless coverage and sensationalism surrounding the case. The acquittal also raised concerns about racial bias in the justice system, as many believed that Simpson's wealth and celebrity status played a role in the outcome. The O.J. Simpson trial continues to be a subject of debate and analysis, serving as a cautionary tale about the complexities of the justice system, the influence of media, and the enduring power of racial prejudice.