10 Shocking Revelations in Netflix's Till Murder Do Us Part: Soering Vs Haysom Documentary

Article Overview

The Netflix docuseries

Till Murder Do Us Part

reveals that Jens Soering and Elizabeth Haysom committed other crimes while on the run, leading to their arrest for the Haysom murders.

The love letters exchanged between Jens and Elizabeth offered compelling evidence of their complicity in the Haysom murders, marking a significant turning point in the investigation.

By placing the blame solely on Jens and asserting his solitary involvement in her parents' murders, Elizabeth Haysom disrupted the narrative surrounding the case.

10. Jens & Elizabeth Committed Other Crimes While On The Run

Netflix’s docuseries Till Murder Do Us Part: Soering vs. Haysom in 2023 not only recounts a chilling true crime case but also unveils several shocking revelations. Spanning four parts that explore different perspectives on the case, Till Murder Do Us Part delves into the gruesome murders of Derek and Nancy Haysom in 1985. Initially, their daughter Elizabeth Haysom and her German boyfriend Jens Soering emerged as the primary suspects. However, as the plot thickens, the two lovers point fingers at each other, each claiming to be the true killer. This unexpected turn of events captivated the public. Given the conflicting accounts at the heart of Till Murder Do Us Part, the Netflix docuseries uncovers significant revelations about Elizabeth Haysom and Jens Soering’s involvement in the Haysom murders. With the passage of time, advancements in technology have led to new breakthroughs in the investigation. Additionally, insightful interviews with investigators, forensic experts, and Jens Soering himself shed light on the Haysom case, revealing that neither Jens nor Elizabeth can be trusted.

10. Jens & Elizabeth Committed Other Crimes While On The Run

Jens & Elizabeth's Other Crimes Led To Their Arrest For The Haysom Murders

9. Jens & Elizabeth’s Love Letters Led To Their Downfall

Although the Netflix documentary Till Murder Do Us Part primarily focuses on the murders of Derek and Nancy Haysom, it also sheds light on additional unlawful activities committed by Jens Soering and Elizabeth Haysom. While evading capture in European and Asian countries, the duo engaged in multiple instances of fraud by issuing counterfeit checks using fake identities. As a result, they managed to accumulate a significant amount of illicit money. However, these unlawful activities eventually caught the attention of the Metropolitan Police, leading to the arrest of Jens and Elizabeth in London. Though initially perceived as a lesser offense, this arrest turned out to be a crucial breakthrough in the investigation of the Haysom murder cases. The Metropolitan Police's intensified scrutiny of the couple revealed evidence linking them to the murders, thereby assisting the ongoing investigation in Virginia. Beyond their direct involvement in the murder case, the couple's other crimes exemplify their firm belief that they were immune to the law and exempt from prosecution. This utter lack of remorse or regard for the consequences of their actions adds to the heinous nature of their deeds.

Jens & Elizabeth’s Letters Had Evidence Of Their Involvement In The Haysom Murders

Jens and Elizabeth’s love letters to each other not only revealed their intense obsession with each other but also provided incriminating evidence of their involvement in the Haysom murders. The Metropolitan Police, upon arresting Jens and Elizabeth for fraud, delved deeper into their investigation and seized their love letters as additional evidence. However, as they sifted through the letters, the Metropolitan Police stumbled upon evidence of a far more sinister crime than the fraud they were originally probing. Within these correspondences, both Jens and Elizabeth openly expressed their contempt for Elizabeth’s parents and confessed their direct involvement in the murders. Their letters also touched upon various aspects of the Haysom murders, including the police investigation in Virginia, painting a vivid picture of their complicity. Prior to the discovery of these letters, there had been limited physical evidence linking the couple to the crime scene. However, the content of the letters shattered the murder investigation wide open. Ultimately, it was Jens and Elizabeth’s paper trail that led to their own downfall in relation to the murders.

8. Elizabeth Haysom Blamed Jens For Her Parents’ Murders

Elizabeth Claimed Jens Acted Alone In The Murders (Despite Having Pled Guilty)

Despite both Elizabeth Haysom and Jens Soering confessing to the police during questioning about the Haysom murders, Elizabeth later shifted blame entirely onto Jens for her parents’ deaths. In her case hearing, Elizabeth accepted a substantial amount of responsibility for her parents’ demise, admitting to fabricating their alibi and manipulating Jens into supporting her scheme. However, Elizabeth failed to admit her direct involvement in the actual murders. Instead, she asserted that Jens acted independently while she was in D.C., orchestrating their alibi. Elizabeth acknowledged her role in manipulating Jens but claimed that he had the choice to proceed with the killings. This shift in blame from Elizabeth to Jens regarding the Haysom murders initiated a pattern of finger-pointing between the two that lasted for years. Consequently, Elizabeth's assertion that Jens bore responsibility for the murders marked a pivotal moment in the case, fundamentally altering the conversation surrounding the crimes.

7. Jens Soering Initially Couldn’t Be Tried In The United States

The Possibility Of The Death Penalty Made It Unlawful To Extradite Jens Soering To The U.S.

In Till Murder Do Us Part, episode 3 "Jens," Jens Soering's trial for the Haysom murders is examined, shedding light on the reasons for the delay. Elizabeth Haysom was extradited to the United States, while Jens was able to avoid extradition due to the possibility of capital punishment, which was supported by the European Court of Human Rights. Only when the decision was made to remove the death penalty as a potential punishment, could Jens be extradited. However, this lengthy process resulted in Jens being tried in 1990, five years after the murders, which potentially contributed to the inconsistencies in his narrative.

6. Elizabeth Haysom Lied About Her Parents’ Abuse

Elizabeth Haysom Gave Conflicting Statements About Her Mother’s Abuse

During both Elizabeth Haysom's case hearing and Jens Soering's trial, the issue of potential abuse by the Haysoms towards Elizabeth was brought up. However, Elizabeth provided contradictory statements regarding the occurrence of such abuse. When questioned during her case hearing, Elizabeth denied being abused by her mother with her father's knowledge. Strangely, during Jens' criminal trial, she changed her stance and acknowledged the abuse as a factor contributing to her anger towards her parents. The contradictory statements made by Elizabeth regarding her parents are significant for several reasons. Firstly, they provide a plausible motive for Elizabeth to be the true perpetrator of Derek and Nancy Haysom's murders. Consequently, this lends support to the possibility of Jens' innocence. Secondly, Elizabeth's inconsistent responses regarding the abuse further highlight her willingness to lie, even under oath, which raises concerns about her potential as a serious threat.

5. Jens Soering’s Testimony Paints A Different Picture Of The Murders

Jens Claims In His Trial That Elizabeth Was The Real Killer

Although Jens initially pleaded guilty to the Haysom murders, he completely changed his narrative when he testified in his murder trial, contradicting both his previous statements and Elizabeth's. According to Jens, Elizabeth was the actual culprit responsible for her parents' deaths, not him. He claimed that the truth behind the murders was the complete opposite of their original story: Elizabeth killed her parents while he created an alibi in D.C. After committing the murders, Elizabeth disclosed the details to Jens so that he could memorize them and take the blame. Jens' change of testimony during his trial stands out as one of the most shocking moments in the Haysom murder case, completely upending the alleged "facts" of the case. This development presents a significant challenge as there is a lack of evidence to either confirm or refute Jens' or Elizabeth's accounts, resulting in a "he said, she said" conflict. Ultimately, Jens attributing the murder to Elizabeth serves as yet another clear indication that both he and Elizabeth are willing to distort the truth under any circumstances, rendering their statements unreliable.

4. Poor Police Investigation Makes It Impossible To Tell What Really Happened

The Police Missed Important Evidence That Could Point To The Real Killer

Numerous revelations came to light regarding the Haysom murders during Jens Soering’s criminal case, shedding light on the shortcomings of the police. As part of Jens' defense, several errors in the initial police investigation were uncovered. Two significant missed opportunities involved verifying whether the cigarettes found at the crime scene belonged to Elizabeth and the failure to thoroughly probe their alibi in D.C. Jens' defense team argues that pursuing these leads could have easily resolved the case's lingering questions. However, due to the considerable passage of time, the pertinent evidence is now destroyed. As a consequence of the police's negligence, determining the true perpetrator of the Haysom murders is now deemed impossible.

3. Jens Soering Was Found Guilty Of The Haysom Murders (Despite Maintaining His Innocence)

Physical Evidence At The Crime Scene Led To Jens’ Conviction

Despite claiming his innocence, Jens Soering was pronounced guilty of the Haysom murders, despite evidence that suggested Elizabeth may have been involved. The crime scene yielded compelling physical evidence, including a bloody footprint and blood matching Jens' blood type, which seemed to incriminate him. Although Jens presented valid arguments to discredit this evidence as proof of his guilt, the jury disagreed, resulting in Jens receiving two life sentences. The verdict was a shocking moment in the true crime Netflix documentary, as mounting evidence suggested Elizabeth's possible complicity prior to the conviction.

2. Forensic Evidence Placed Jens At The Crime Scene Years Later

Physical Evidence From The Crime Scene Suggests Jens Was There Despite DNA Tests Being Negative

Contrary to Jens Soering's belief that the physical evidence presented during his trial lacked conviction, a startling forensic test conducted near the end of the true crime documentary paints a different picture. Despite Jens' dismissal of the bloody sock print as "junk science," a forensic podiatrist featured in the film presents evidence to the contrary. By performing a comparison between Elizabeth and Jens' footprints with the print discovered at the crime scene, it is determined that Jens' foot aligns more closely with the evidence than Elizabeth's. This revelation shatters Jens' claims of innocence and strongly implicates him at the scene of the crime.

1. Netflix’s Till Death Do Us Part Suggests A New Theory For The Haysoms’ Murder

The Netflix Documentary Suggests Jens & Elizabeth Committed The Crime Together

The Netflix documentary Till Murder Do Us Part delivers a shocking revelation towards the end. The docuseries introduces a completely new theory regarding the killings. The documentary extensively examines the evidence related to the Haysom murders in an attempt to uncover whether Elizabeth or Jens was the perpetrator. However, inconsistencies in the evidence prevent a definite conclusion. The documentary proposes a different perspective, suggesting that both Jens and Elizabeth were present at the crime scene and jointly responsible for the deaths of Elizabeth's parents.

There is a significant indication that supports the theory of both Jens and Elizabeth's involvement. Elizabeth's brother claims that their mother had mentioned expecting a visit from the couple on the weekend she was murdered. This explanation could account for the lack of signs of forced entry. Furthermore, it offers an explanation for the various pieces of evidence that seem to link both suspects to the crime scene, such as Jens' sock print and Elizabeth's cigarettes. While it remains impossible to ascertain the identity of the true killer of Derek and Nancy Haysom, the new theory introduced in Till Murder Do Us Part: Soering vs. Haysom presents a compelling case that sheds light on what might have transpired.

Where To Watch Till Murder Do Us Part: Soering Vs. Haysom