Summary
The Boys season 2 subtly references J. Robert Oppenheimer, foreshadowing the moral complexity present in the show and highlighting the morally gray characters.
The inclusion of the Oppenheimer reference in the show enhances its overall message regarding the relationship between power and science, by highlighting the striking similarities between the destructive capabilities of the atomic bomb and Vought's Compound V. Both the Oppenheimer film and The Boys explore the unintended ramifications of human actions, effectively demonstrating the ethical boundaries of scientific progress and the perilous consequences of unrestrained authority.
The popular Prime Video series, The Boys, gained international acclaim for its unique and thought-provoking approach to the superhero genre. Unlike traditional Marvel and DC Comics, the show presents a morally complex view of superheroes, resembling entitled influencers more than altruistic saviors. In one scene from the second season, a character named Stan Edgar references J. Robert Oppenheimer, subtly exploring the ethical challenges of science and power. This mention of Oppenheimer, known as "the father of the atomic bomb," adds complexity to The Boys by connecting it to real historical events. It also foreshadows the moral complexities that arise in Christopher Nolan's Oppenheimer.
Stan Edgar's Reference To Oppenheimer In Season 2 Explained
In an often overlooked scene in Season 2 of The Boys, Stan Edgar, played by Giancarlo Esposito, reveals the untold story of Vought International to Homelander, portrayed by Antony Starr. Without an appointment, Homelander storms into Edgar's office to express his dissatisfaction with the decision to add Stormfront, played by Aya Cash, to The Seven without consulting him first. In response, Homelander threatens to leave Vought once his contract expires at the end of the year.
Following an awkward silence, Edgar confronts Homelander by questioning his knowledge of Vought International's founder, Federick Vought. It is revealed that Vought earned his doctorate from Munich and was a pioneer in the field of genetics. In The Boys' fictional timeline, Vought was appointed by Hitler as the chief physician of the Dachau concentration camp during Nazi Germany. There, Vought conducted horrific genetic experiments using imprisoned humans as subjects. However, in 1944, Vought turned against Hitler as the war began to turn in favor of the Allies. Despite this change in allegiance, Vought continued his unethical experiments in the United States. As Edgar recounts this dark history, he warns Homelander:
"During the early days of 1944, he sensed a shift in the winds and was whisked away to join the allies. While Oppenheimer struggled with the bomb, Dr. Vought had already successfully tested practical uses of Compound B in the field, earning him the admiration and respect of soldiers fighting on the front lines. As a result, Roosevelt granted him a pardon, and he assimilated into American society, embodying the quintessential Wonder Bread American spirit alongside iconic figures like Disney and Edison."
The dialogue between Edgar and Homelander cleverly intertwines Vought's involvement in World War II with real historical events. By alluding to Oppenheimer, The Boys seamlessly integrates its own fictional narrative with actual moments from history. It is significant that Oppenheimer is used in the show, as his moral dilemma reflects the themes present in the Prime Video series. One can even draw parallels between the devastating consequences of the atomic bomb and the high cost associated with the creation of Compound V.
How The Oppenheimer Reference Subtly Strengthens The Boys' Message About Power & Science
The Oppenheimer reference in season 2 of The Boys serves as a powerful reminder of the complexities of science, power, and the moral dilemmas that often accompany them. Nolan's biography of Oppenheimer further emphasizes this, as it portrays General Leslie Groves Jr. appointing the physicist to develop the atomic bomb. This devastating weapon has the potential to end the war at the cost of countless lives. However, when Oppenheimer witnesses the destructive aftermath of his Trinity test, he quotes the Bhagavad Gita, recognizing the immense destruction caused by his attempt to save people.
The Boys reflects a similar sentiment, showcasing how Vought's Compound V, while intended to help people, ends up harming as many as it aids. By utilizing this substance, the company creates super-powered individuals known as Supes. While some, like Starlight, use their abilities for the greater good, many others misuse their powers, causing harm to those around them. Through its experiments, Vought International finds itself entangled in a moral dilemma similar to Oppenheimer's predicament.
The Oppenheimer Movie & The Boys Both Deal With Unintended Consequences
Oppenheimer's invention, as depicted in the film, sheds light on the unforeseen repercussions it brings. Towards the end of the movie, Oppenheimer shares his belief with Einstein that the atomic bomb's creation marks the beginning of the world's destruction. He warns that this invention may trigger a chain reaction, compelling people to develop more potent and deadly weapons. Despite his initial intention to prevent future wars, Oppenheimer's creation ultimately sets off new cycles of violence.
Similarly, The Boys tackles the unintended consequences of human actions. Vought International, ostensibly developing Compound V to safeguard humanity and promote peace, inadvertently gives rise to The Seven, who embody both justice and peace, as well as violence and hypocrisy. The company loses control over their creations, leading to Supes like Homelander wreaking havoc instead of preventing it. Even the Supes who strive to do the right thing are suppressed by the corrupt system, illustrating how quickly unchecked power can spiral out of control.
Why Moral Grayness Makes The Boys & Oppenheimer Better
The Boys stands out in a saturated market of idealistic crime-fighting superhero stories by daring to portray these beings from a more nuanced perspective. The show prompts contemplating whether the end truly justifies the means, and delves into the consequences of unchecked power. It draws a parallel between Oppenheimer and the characters, inadvertently foreshadowing the complexity of its lead, Nolan's Oppenheimer.
Moral ambiguity takes center stage in The Boys as the characters grapple with their actions. Homelander genuinely believes he is an all-knowing god who acts in the best interest of the people. Butcher's quest for revenge drives him to use Compound V on himself, morphing into the very thing he fights against. Meanwhile, Stan Edgar's business-minded focus dismisses human lives, despite his claims of consideration. These characters' captivating stories push viewers to question the interplay between power and morality. Additionally, the existence of Compound V, much like the atomic bomb, raises thought-provoking dilemmas concerning the ethical boundaries of scientific progress.
The Boys cleverly interweaves complex historical figures such as Oppenheimer into its narrative, even if briefly. This technique creates a notable parallel between these real-life individuals and the characters in the show, shedding light on the moral quandaries and obstacles encountered by both the Supes and Butcher's group of vigilantes. Consequently, the audience is prompted to ponder broader questions concerning the control of those in power, the ethical validity of their actions, and the potentially flawed perception of heroism by humans.