Unveiling the GOP Candidates Who Hold Zelensky's Fate: A Critical Analysis
Presidential hopefuls advocating unwavering backing for Ukraine hold the strongest sway over Republican voters, influencing Zelensky's future Insight by Lanhee J Chen
During Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's visit to Washington, nearly 30 Republican lawmakers expressed their opposition to the Biden administration's request for an additional $24 billion in funding to support Ukraine's war effort. The letter highlights concerns regarding the lack of clear answers regarding Ukraine's progress in the war, the administration's strategy and endgame in the ongoing conflict, and the allocation of previously appropriated funds for the war effort.
Lanhee J. Chen
These questions warrant careful scrutiny and robust discussion. Therefore, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy should deliberate on the administration's request independently from the ongoing talks regarding a possible government shutdown. The concerns raised in the GOP letter are legitimate and should not be disregarded as a predictable response from a faction of conservative Republicans in light of the Biden administration's agenda in an election year. They mirror the apprehension and skepticism shared by numerous voters nationwide, particularly among Republicans, when it comes to providing ongoing aid to Ukraine.
While there may be various reasons for these concerns, the main issue seems to be a lack of understanding regarding two crucial matters. The first is the significance of ongoing support for American national interests, and the second is the ultimate goal of our commitment to Ukraine, especially considering the uncertainty surrounding Ukraine's ability to successfully counter Russia, which could persist for years.
Some responsibility lies with the Ukrainian leadership for their failure to clearly communicate their plans and provide transparent updates on the utilization of existing US aid. However, a larger portion of the blame should be placed on Republican leaders who have not adequately explained to their constituents why continued involvement in Ukraine is an important priority amidst the numerous financial and substantive challenges our nation faces.
An early version of an Army Tactical Missile System is tested December 14, 2021, at White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico.
John Hamilton/Digital/White Sands Missile Range Public Affairs
Opinion: The myth of the wonder weapon
Republican leaders can present persuasive arguments to convince voters of the importance of supporting Ukraine. If Russian President Vladimir Putin's aggression against Ukraine is not stopped, it poses a threat to peace and stability in Europe. Europe is an essential economic and strategic partner for the United States. Additionally, it is in America's interest to counter Russian aggression, which is evident in Ukraine and also extends to interference in our elections, cyberattacks on American institutions and businesses, and support for terror attacks against our allies. Furthermore, abandoning support for Ukraine would send a negative message to China. Chinese leader Xi Jinping is keen on expanding China's sphere of influence in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond.
It is crucial for policymakers who advocate for continued aid to Ukraine to clearly and concisely outline the criteria for determining when our assistance is no longer necessary. Voters rightfully worry about America being entangled in prolonged commitments in a war that may not conclude anytime soon.
While there is a divide among GOP policymakers regarding ongoing American support for Ukraine, the prevailing stance among Republican voters aligns closely with the view expressed in the GOP congressional letter extended to Zelensky this week. This trend is underscored by substantial data. According to a July CNN survey, nearly three out of four self-identified Republicans opposed augmenting the US funding for the war efforts in Ukraine, with opposition being particularly strong among more conservative Republicans (compared to 61% of moderate and liberal Republicans who opposed increased funding). Among the Republicans surveyed, 60% asserted that the US has already fulfilled its obligations to Ukraine, while only 30% favored supplying additional weapons to Kyiv.
{{img_placeholder_2}}
Opinion: Ukraine's progress against Russia is evident.
Notably, three prominent Republican presidential contenders, including former president Donald Trump, businessman Vivek Ramaswamy, and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, have voiced doubts or outright dissent regarding further US funding or involvement in the Ukrainian war effort.
Despite the political challenges, several GOP presidential candidates, such as Nikki Haley, Mike Pence, and Chris Christie, have consistently expressed their support for American involvement in Ukraine, even when contrasting with Trump. Haley criticized Trump for being "weak in the knees" on Ukraine, while Pence warned that giving Putin what he wants would be the only way to end the war. Christie even called Trump a "puppet of Putin" for not siding with Ukraine. These candidates, who advocate for continued support to Ukraine, are in the best position to convince Republican voters. If one of them were to become the Republican Party's nominee, their viewpoint would likely become the party's official stance for the upcoming election and beyond. Senate Republican leaders and numerous Republican members in Congress have also expressed their backing for Ukraine.
Get Our Free Weekly Newsletter
Sign up for CNN Opinions newsletter
Join us on Twitter and Facebook.
Currently, the clashes among GOP contenders have portrayed Ukraine as a divisive matter, setting Trump apart from other candidates such as Haley, Pence, or Christie. However, less attention has been devoted to educating voters during the campaign about the significance of supporting Ukraine for our country's interests.
With the GOP policymakers and leaders sharply divided on the issue of US aid to Ukraine, it appears highly improbable that Republican voter opinions will undergo such a drastic transformation to support substantial and long-term American engagement, unless there is a significant development in the war. However, it falls upon Haley, Pence, and Christie to present their arguments and potentially sway Zelensky's prospects and those in America who desire ongoing assistance for Ukraine, in order to influence Republican voters' perspective and the policymakers who have become disenchanted with our efforts to assist Kyiv in winning the war.
