Summary
The Witcher writer defends season 3, episode 6's opening scene, claiming it is accurate to the source material and providing evidence.
Viewers have raised concerns about the scene's accuracy, pointing out inconsistencies with passages from the book and expressing their dissatisfaction with the depiction of Dijkstra.
Despite facing continuous criticism for its deviation from the original source material, the show manages to maintain some alignment with key events in season 3.
The Witcher executive producer and writer, Javier Grillo-Marxuach, has defended the opening scene of season 3, episode 6, which received backlash for deviating from the source material. With the final episodes of season 3 now streaming on Netflix, the show has faced ongoing scrutiny for its departure from the original books. The criticism intensified when Henry Cavill (Geralt) announced his departure from the show after season 3. Recently, viewers criticized the opening scene in "Everybody Has a Plan 'til They Get Punched in the Face," where Dijkstra (Graham McTavish) brandished a knife at Geralt while urinating in a plant.
In response to the backlash, Grillo-Marxuach addressed the criticism surrounding the opening scene.
Grillo-Marxuach disputes allegations that the show's writers disregard the books, asserting that the scene in question is indeed in the books and even providing evidence to support this claim. Despite this, some viewers remain resolute in their opposition.
One user, @Undy567, shares a screenshot from the book that challenges the writer's assertion about the scene's accuracy. The screenshot emphasizes that Geralt would never relieve himself in a plant and highlights discrepancies between the events in the book and how they were portrayed in episode 6. The user also points out that Dijkstra would not be able to surprise Geralt. The writer does not respond to this tweet.
Why The Witcher Season 3 Is Still Disappointing To Audiences
The trajectory of The Witcher's story has sparked controversy amongst fans. Followers of the book series by Polish author Andrej Sapkowski have expressed their dissatisfaction with how much the Netflix show deviates from the novels. Season 3, episode 6's opener is just one example of the changes made by the showrunners, leading to a domino effect of alterations. While the writers and producers have pledged to stay true to the source material, viewers are still disappointed with the show's departure from the original formula.
A producer has acknowledged that straying from the source material can sometimes be necessary. Despite a 22 percent Rotten Tomatoes score for season 3, the show's future may not be as bleak as it seems. Producers and directors continue to defend the show's trajectory, pointing out that major adaptations often require changes to characters' stories to suit a live-action setting. Adding depth and complexity through expanded backstories and new decisions not found in the books can enhance the characters' journeys.
The Witcher season 3 maintains a higher level of fidelity to its source material compared to its previous seasons. Significant events, including the deaths of Codringher and Fenn, and Ciri's exploration of the Korath desert, are portrayed in a manner closely resembling the book. Nevertheless, the show's endorsement of contentious alterations continues to raise the perpetual question of the extent to which adaptations can deviate from the original while still maintaining loyalty.
Source: @Undy567/Twitter, Javier Grillo-Marxuach/Twitter