The Influence of Anti-Feminist Gaming YouTubers: A Man's Attack on Nancy Pelosi's Husband
Accused in federal trial claims radicalization by anti-feminist gaming YouTubers led to his attack on Nancy Pelosi's husband Trial concludes with his testimony
David DePape, the assailant of Paul Pelosi, the husband of former US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, has attributed his radicalization to YouTube content promoting anti-feminist gaming.
During his trial, as reported by KQED, DePape revealed his journey into radicalization. He explained that he initially held political opposition to Trump, but later became immersed in right-wing conspiracy media. As an avid gamer, DePape stumbled upon videos related to the Gamergate movement, which involved misogynistic harassment, while searching for gameplay guides and advice.
DePape expressed his curiosity to understand the situation by looking up strategies to defeat a video game boss. However, he was surprised to come across numerous individuals repeatedly discussing Anita Sarkeesian's alleged toxicity. Intrigued, he wanted to gather information from both perspectives.
This sparked his increasing consumption of right-wing internet content. DePape dedicated a substantial amount of time, at least six hours a day and even longer on weekends, to listen to YouTubers and podcasters such as James Lindsay, Jimmy Dore, and Glenn Beck. During these sessions, he would play video games without sound in the Richmond garage where he resided, lacking basic amenities like a bed and shower.
DePape allegedly entered the Pelosis' residence on October 22, 2022, with the purpose of questioning Nancy about a conspiracy known as Russiagate. His plan involved injuring her kneecaps and bringing her to Congress to expose what he believed were the deceitful actions of the ruling class. Among his belongings, which included a rope and zip-ties to restrain Pelosi, he also had a Nintendo Switch.
DePape currently faces charges of trying to apprehend a federal officer and assaulting a family member of a federal official. If found guilty, he could receive a life sentence. His defense team argues that DePape's actions were not motivated by Pelosi's official duties, thus suggesting that the charges are inappropriate. He pleaded not guilty and expressed remorse for harming Paul Pelosi, asserting that he was never his intended target. The closing arguments for this case were presented on Wednesday, November 15.
