The Fascinating Reason Behind Napoleon's Habit of Covering His Ears

The Fascinating Reason Behind Napoleon's Habit of Covering His Ears

Discover the intriguing behavior of Napoleon as he consistently shields his ears, unveiling a unique aspect of his character. Dive into the enigmatic world of Phoenix's Napoleon and his peculiar reactions.

There are moments in Napoleon where Joaquin Phoenix's portrayal of the title character covers his ears from the sound of canons. Ridley Scott's biopic about the French Emperor took some creative liberties, making it challenging for non-history enthusiasts to distinguish between fact and fiction. Despite the deviations from historical records in the movie, Scott had a narrative to share, and Phoenix likely had his own vision for portraying his character.

Napoleon didn't perform exceptionally well at the box office or with critics, but it did receive praise for certain elements. Phoenix skillfully led the cast, infusing his performance with subtleties that showcased his interpretation of the French military leader. While historical inaccuracies were present in Napoleon, many were deliberate alterations and additions to enhance the storyline.

Napoleon's In-Ear Tick Was Made Up For The Movie

There's no evidence the real Napoleon did this

Joaquin Phoenix as Napoleon Bonaparte looking skeptical in Napoleon - There's no evidence the real Napoleon did this - Napoleon's In-Ear Tick Was Made Up For The Movie

Joaquin Phoenix as Napoleon Bonaparte looking skeptical in Napoleon - There's no evidence the real Napoleon did this - Napoleon's In-Ear Tick Was Made Up For The Movie

It's fascinating to note that Joaquin Phoenix's portrayal of Napoleon plugging his ears at the sound of canons is not based on any historical evidence. This unique character trait was most likely created by Phoenix or the movie's director, Ridley Scott. While it may not be historically accurate, it adds depth to Phoenix's depiction of the main character in the film.

Phoenix Covering His Ears Supports Napoleon's Cowardly Characterization

Phoenix's portrayal of Napoleon in Ridley's film showcases a petulant and immature character. It is not surprising then, that this man-child version of the titular figure would react to the sound of canons on the battlefield by covering his ears. This behavior reinforces the image of a childish leader, rather than a courageous one, in the midst of warfare.

The acting choice suited this version of Napoleon well

Joaquin Phoenix covering his ears in Napoleon - The acting choice suited this version of Napoleon well - Phoenix Covering His Ears Supports Napoleon's Cowardly Characterization

Joaquin Phoenix covering his ears in Napoleon - The acting choice suited this version of Napoleon well - Phoenix Covering His Ears Supports Napoleon's Cowardly Characterization

Joaquin Phoenix's portrayal of Napoleon in the movie demonstrates his youthful behavior despite his age. His act of cowering from the sounds of battle also reflects the cowardice depicted by the lead actor. This visual gag is repeatedly used in the film, adding a comedic effect and making the French commander less respectable. While the fingers-in-ears response may seem unique to the Napoleon movie, it was a deliberate choice by the filmmakers.

You can now watch Napoleon on AppleTV+.

Editor's P/S:

The article provides an intriguing glimpse into the creative liberties taken in Ridley Scott's biopic "Napoleon." While historical accuracy is often compromised for narrative purposes, the article highlights the deliberate alterations made to enhance the storyline. The absence of historical evidence for Napoleon's in-ear tick, as portrayed by Joaquin Phoenix, suggests that this character trait was introduced to add depth to Phoenix's interpretation.

The article also explores the implications of this invented behavior, suggesting that it reinforces the portrayal of Napoleon as a petulant and immature character. Phoenix's youthful demeanor, combined with his cowardly reaction to the sound of canons, paints a different picture of the iconic French leader, making him less respectable and more of a comedic figure. Overall, the article raises questions about the balance between historical accuracy and artistic license in cinematic depictions of historical events.