The Manhattan hush money case against Donald Trump is coming to a close, while a new phase of pretrial activities is set to begin in the federal classified documents prosecution he faces in Florida.
On Wednesday, US District Judge Aileen Cannon will listen to arguments from defense attorneys regarding two motions to dismiss charges in the case. The first motion claims that Trump's valet and co-defendant Walt Nauta is facing vindictive prosecution. The second motion argues that the indictment against Trump and his co-defendants has technical flaws that warrant its dismissal.
Special counsel Jack Smith has accused Trump of taking classified national defense documents from the White House after he left office and resisting the government's efforts to retrieve the materials. Trump, along with Nauta and Mar-a-Lago property manager Carlos De Oliveira, have pleaded not guilty.
The judge has granted Trump permission to miss the proceedings scheduled for Wednesday at 10 a.m. ET in the Fort Pierce, Florida courthouse.
The judge's hearing is finally happening after she postponed the trial indefinitely, which was supposed to start this week. It has been over a month since the last public hearing in the case, although there was at least one private meeting held by the judge.
Cannon delayed setting a new trial date due to various unresolved pretrial matters. Starting on Wednesday, there will be a series of hearings scheduled until late July to address some, but not all, of these issues.
Cannon, the judge appointed by Trump, has been criticized by legal experts for moving slowly in the case. They believe she is deliberately delaying the process to benefit the GOP's White House nominee. If Cannon doesn't speed up, it seems unlikely that the charges will be heard by a jury before the 2024 election. If Trump becomes president again, it is anticipated that he will find a way to dismiss the charges against him.
This photo from the US Department of Justice allegedly shows Walt Nauta moving boxes inside former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida.
This photo from the US Department of Justice allegedly shows Walt Nauta moving boxes inside former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida.
From US Department of Justice
Newly released documents provide additional information about the ongoing investigation. In the past, important legal actions taken by Trump against the prosecution were not made available to the public. The legal process has been delayed due to disagreements over what information should be censored in documents that are made public.
On Tuesday, a large number of court documents that were previously confidential were released to the public as part of the former president's attempt to dismiss the charges against him. Among these documents was a ruling from March 2023 by a federal judge in Washington, DC, which stated that there was enough evidence to suggest that Trump had committed crimes. This ruling allowed investigators to access information from his former lawyer that is typically protected by attorney-client privilege.
This photo from the US Department of Justice allegedly shows Walt Nauta moving boxes inside former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida.
This photo from the US Department of Justice allegedly shows Walt Nauta moving boxes inside former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida.
From US Department of Justice
Related article
Federal judge found ‘strong evidence’ of crimes before Trump was charged in classified documents case
Trump is trying to get rid of the evidence obtained during the FBI's search of Mar-a-Lago in August 2022, which includes documents related to the charges against him.
The motions to throw out the evidence have not been set for argument on Wednesday, and there is no hearing scheduled yet.
In her decision on Sunday to make the filings public, Cannon criticized the prosecutors, which is not the first time she has done so. She expressed her "concern" that the special counsel's office had requested redactions of information in the newly released filings after previously allowing the information to be fully published in earlier court documents.
Cannon wrote, "The Court is disappointed in these developments. The rules for sealing and redaction should be consistently and fairly applied based on sufficient evidence and legal justification. Parties should not make requests that contradict previous statements without informing the Court and providing appropriate explanations."
Editor's P/S:
The ongoing legal battles surrounding Donald Trump's alleged mishandling of classified documents highlight the complexities and potential political implications of such cases. While the defense seeks to dismiss charges, the prosecution endeavors to hold Trump accountable for his actions. The judge's role in navigating these proceedings is crucial, and her handling of the case has drawn scrutiny from legal experts. The release of previously confidential documents provides additional insights into the investigation, but the ultimate outcome remains uncertain.
The intersection of politics and the justice system raises concerns about the potential influence of Trump's status as a former president and potential future candidate on the proceedings. The timing of the trial and the possibility of charges being dropped if Trump is re-elected raise questions about the fairness and impartiality of the process. It is essential that the case be handled with the utmost integrity and transparency to ensure that justice is served regardless of political affiliations.