From Triumph to Turmoil: The Shocking Blunder Plunging English Soccer into Chaos
The monumental error that rocked English soccer: A crisis triggered by a breach of trust and integrity Discover the aftermath, key stakeholders' responses, and the pivotal changes required, including the transformation of VAR
Trust forms the foundation of any successful relationship. It is the belief in one another that enables effective resolution of challenges and recovery from difficult situations. However, when integrity is questioned and doubt arises, the resulting damage is often long-lasting unless there is a significant change.
The recent controversy surrounding the unrealized goal in English soccer has created a state of crisis, leading to concerns about the overall quality of refereeing in the country. These concerns have also brought into question the credibility of the system in the English Premier League and have placed the highly criticized Video Assistant Referee (VAR) at a critical turning point.
Liverpool expressed their disappointment in a strongly-worded statement on Sunday, stating that the disallowed goal in their 2-1 defeat against Tottenham undermined the integrity of the sport. The English soccer refereeing body acknowledged it as a "significant human error," adding to the growing list of mistakes since the introduction of VAR in the Premier League. However, this particular error is arguably the most significant thus far.
What happened?
Tottenham vs. Liverpool: A Clash of Title Contenders
In a fiercely contested match with only 10 players remaining, Liverpool and the spectators were taken by surprise when Mohamed Salah skillfully delivered a through ball to Luis Díaz, who expertly converted it, granting the visitors an unexpected advantage before the halftime mark.
In a Premier League match between Tottenham Hotspur and Liverpool at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium in London, England on September 30, 2023, Luis Diaz of Liverpool scored a goal that was subsequently ruled out.
Peter Cziborra/Action Images/Reuters
Liverpool says sporting integrity in Premier League match against Tottenham undermined after VAR error
The goal was swiftly disallowed due to an offside call, despite television replays clearly indicating that the Colombian player was positioned behind the final line of defense when Salah executed his pass. Therefore, the goal should have been rightfully deemed valid. Nevertheless, a moment of confusion arose among the match officials immediately after Díaz scored, exposing a significant flaw within the VAR system: inadequate communication.
Darren England, the VAR for the match, typically followed the standard procedure of tracing lines on the screen to verify if the goal was offside. After careful analysis, he confirmed that it was indeed not offside.
However, due to a momentary lapse of concentration, England mistakenly thought that referee Simon Hooper had allowed the goal when, in reality, he had actually disallowed it due to being offside.
England's response to Hooper's decision, thinking that it confirmed Hooper's goal, was to acknowledge the referee's initial decision rather than intervening and overturning it.
Unfortunately, by the time play had been restarted, it was already too late to rectify the error. According to the rules, the referee is only allowed to review an incident once play has resumed, but solely in cases of "mistaken identity" or for potential offenses like violent conduct, spitting, biting, or extremely offensive, insulting, and/or abusive actions.
Who has said what?
The match carried on at a frenzied and chaotic tempo, Tottenham swiftly securing the lead after the disallowed goal, and Liverpool equalizing. However, the game ultimately concluded with nine players on Liverpool's side and a devastating own goal scored in the final moments of injury time.The Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL), the governing body for English soccer refereeing, referred to the incident as a "clear and obvious factual error" and stated that they would conduct a comprehensive review of the circumstances that led to the mistake.
As a consequence of their error, England and his assistant, Dan Cook, were replaced for two Premier League games: Nottingham Forest vs. Brentford on Sunday and Fulham vs. Chelsea on Monday. However, their glaring mistake continues to draw significant attention and criticism.
On Sunday, Liverpool issued a statement expressing their discontent with the categorization of the mistake as a "significant human error." They emphasized that the review process should solely determine the resulting actions, with complete transparency.
On Monday, reports emerged that the club had officially requested audio recordings of the officials' discussion regarding the incident. The Daily Telegraph reported on Tuesday that PGMOL has indeed provided Liverpool with the requested audio recordings.
Why is this error so significant?
Simon Hooper shows Curtis Jones of Liverpool a yellow card for a foul, which was upgraded to a red.
Marc Atkins/Getty Images
The core issue lies in the lack of effective communication among match officials and a failure to prioritize practicality over adherence to protocols.
Introduced in the 2019/20 season, VAR serves as a match official stationed in an operations room with access to match footage, assisted by one or more assistant VARs. Its primary role is to closely monitor the game, searching for any possible infractions that the on-field referee may overlook.
Rules and protocols must be adhered to. The VAR's role is limited in assisting the referee, specifically in cases of a "clear and obvious error" or "serious missed incident" related to four scenarios: goals or no goals, penalties or no penalties, direct red cards, or cases of mistaken identity.
Despite the presence of technology, refereeing errors have not been completely eliminated. Given that humans are operating the system, human error is likely to persist.
Mistakes are inevitable, and the Premier League has already witnessed numerous errors this season. Liverpool manager Jurgen Klopp acknowledged this after their defeat on Saturday, stating, "I believe the mistake was unintentional." However, determining whether a player is offside or not is one of the soccer rules that leaves little room for interpretation. While there may be marginal decisions at times, a player is either onside or offside, and in Díaz's situation, he was clearly onside by a significant margin.
Alan Shearer, a former captain of the England national team, criticized the decision on the BBC soccer show "Match of the Day," labeling it a "monumental error" that raises concerns about the accuracy of previous and future offside rulings.
What makes this situation particularly peculiar is that the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) should have immediately recognized the grave mistake when the goal was disallowed by Hooper. Surprisingly, no action was taken, possibly due to the existing protocols that hindered any intervention. The main question that remains unanswered is when exactly the VAR acknowledged the error.
Referee Simon Hooper views the VAR monitor before sending off Curtis Jones.
Visionhaus/Getty Images Europe
Neil Atkinson, presenter and CEO of the Liverpool fan podcast, The Anfield Wrap, told CNN Sports Don Riddell that the "whole system has failed."
"It raises doubts about what is being communicated or withheld from the referee, which is why Liverpool is seeking the audio," he stated.
"Moreover, immediately after the disallowed goal, they should have been vigilant. This is when terms like protocols become relevant, and Liverpools concern arises from the referees giving precedence to protocols rather than upholding sporting integrity."
Ultimately, it is common knowledge that the goal should be awarded in the moment, or at least within 10 seconds. Surprisingly, however, no action is taken to rectify the situation, which greatly undermines the effectiveness of the VAR process, the quality of refereeing, and the overall communication.
Personally, my concern lies in the process itself, as I strongly believe in the importance of having trust and faith in it.
What happens next?
The release of the audio of the conversations between the match officials would likely influence what Liverpool does next.
The club stated that it would consider various options to address and resolve the situation, without providing specific details.
Speculation arises about the possibility of a replay, although it is unlikely as there is no previous instance of this occurring in English soccer.
Klopp watched his side lose 2-1 thanks to a late Joel Matip own goal.
Justin Setterfield/Getty Images
It is precedent which would be key in any legal argument.
According to Stephen Taylor Heath, co-head of sports law at JWM Solicitors, Liverpool's result would probably be considered a moral victory rather than a legal victory. He mentioned that lawyers prefer to work with definite evidence and it would be challenging to prove that the match outcome would have changed if the goal was allowed.
"If they have requested the audio, it clearly signifies their intention for PGMOL to substantiate the accuracy of their statement," remarked Taylor Heath.
"It may not necessarily lead to legal action from Liverpool, but it could bring about accountability of the officials within PGMOL by the Premier League. This could prompt necessary reforms within PGMOL, changes that they might be unwilling to make otherwise, in order to prevent a recurrence of such situations. For Liverpool, it simply seeks improvements in the processes involved."
It would be extremely challenging for the club to achieve success in pursuing legal action to compel the Premier League to arrange a rematch, or alternatively, to declare a different outcome.
While they might attain some form of retribution, it may not necessarily be advantageous for the club in relation to the result of the match.
Taylor Heath highlights that according to Rule L18 of the Premier League, a league match can be replayed if recommended by a commission. In this regard, Liverpool might be interested in obtaining the audio to submit a formal application to the EPL for the establishment of an independent commission. It is possible that the commission's authority could extend to ordering a replay of the match.
Video Ad Feedback
VAR Under Fire After Error in Spurs-Liverpool Match
04:16
- Source:
CNN
Changing VAR
It is highly probable that certain VAR rules may undergo modifications in light of the prevailing circumstances. Additionally, increased attention might be directed towards enhancing the overall standards of refereeing, as the latter has faced significant scrutiny from the English media in recent times.
There are numerous opinions on how VAR could be enhanced. Soccer journalist Henry Winter shared six suggested improvements, and more are being added. The Daily Telegraph and other English newspapers have also discussed ways to fix VAR. Englishman Howard Webb, the first chief refereeing officer of PGMOL, was appointed to improve standards in the use of VAR after overseeing its introduction in Major League Soccer.
DÃaz scoring a goal that was later disallowed.
Webb frequently engaged with the media during his stay in the US, as reported by PA Media. He held regular calls to address various incidents and also published weekly explanatory videos that featured in-game communication among officials.
In May, the English soccer introduced a new feature where in-game audio from VAR decisions was broadcasted for the first time. This occurred during the appearance of Webb on the We Monday Night Football program, where he discussed various VAR decisions from the 2022/23 season.
Currently, PGMOL is not permitted to broadcast live in-game discussions while a match is ongoing. However, taking inspiration from other sports and adopting a more transparent approach may serve to restore trust in the system. It is important to note that any changes to VAR rules can only be implemented by the International Football Association Board (IFAB), the governing body for international games.
In rugby union, fans have the opportunity to listen to match officials discussing important decisions, ensuring transparency and accessibility for all. Moreover, the sport values the careful reviewing of decisions, without feeling pressured to quickly resume the game.
In contrast, soccer is currently experimenting with communicating VAR decisions to stadium spectators, with limited implementation observed during events such as the Women's World Cup.
As a result, VAR officials England and Cook will not be participating in this weekend's Premier League matches. However, the refereeing system in England needs significant improvement to regain the trust of fans, players, and clubs in the future.
