Fresh Allegations Surface Against Harvey Weinstein Before Retrial, Prosecutor Reveals

A Manhattan prosecutor mentioned on Wednesday that there could be a new indictment against Harvey Weinstein due to more accusers coming forward with allegations against the influential Hollywood producer. His downfall became a prominent symbol of the #MeToo movement.

Assistant District Attorney Nicole Blumberg informed Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Curtis Farber that they are currently looking into the claims made by the new accusers. She also mentioned that not all of them are prepared to speak out at this time.

Blumberg confirmed to the judge that there is a possibility of a new indictment against Weinstein.

He also mentioned that prosecutors are currently reviewing which claims can still be prosecuted under the statute of limitations.

Blumberg emphasized the importance of protecting the identities of the survivors in court. It is crucial for the survivors to feel safe and secure during the legal proceedings.

The hearing held on Wednesday, leading up to Weinstein's retrial, follows a recent decision by the New York Court of Appeals. The court ruled, by a 4-3 vote, that testimony from "prior bad acts" witnesses should not have been allowed. This decision was based on the belief that such testimony was not necessary to prove the defendant's intent and only served to highlight the defendant's potential to commit the crimes in question.

Weinstein, aged 72, was found guilty in 2020 of first-degree criminal sexual act and third-degree rape, resulting in a 23-year prison sentence. Despite this, he continues to claim his innocence and denies engaging in any nonconsensual sexual activity.

In a recent development, prosecutors have once again requested the court to caution Weinstein’s legal team against making public statements that could unfairly influence potential witnesses and harm the case.

Former film producer Harvey Weinstein made his first court appearance since his conviction was overturned on Wednesday, May 1, 2024.

Former film producer Harvey Weinstein made his first court appearance since his conviction was overturned on Wednesday, May 1, 2024.

Curtis Means/Pool/AFP/Getty Images

Related article

Manhattan District Attorney prosecutor has announced plans to retry the Harvey Weinstein sex crimes case. Defense attorney Arthur Aidala recently claimed that witness Miriam “Mimi” Haley lied to jurors about her financial motives for coming forward with the allegations. Aidala stated that Haley will face cross-examination on this matter if she chooses to appear in court.

In court on Wednesday, Aidala confidently stated, "No one has ever needed to remind me of my ethical duties in my 32 years of practice."

He also maintained that his comments regarding Haley were truthful and denied any intention of intimidating the witness.

The next court date is scheduled for July 8. Farber asked prosecutors to inform the defense if they decide to convene a new grand jury.

The defense team mentioned to CNN that Weinstein might testify in front of the grand jury if this occurs.

Weinstein has been in prison since last year when he was sentenced to 16 years for rape and sexual assault in Los Angeles. The trial, which featured witnesses testifying about his past behavior, is currently under appeal.

Once a prominent figure in Hollywood, Weinstein was known for producing popular films like "Pulp Fiction," "Clerks," and "Shakespeare in Love." However, his reputation was tarnished when numerous women came forward as part of the #MeToo movement, shedding light on the prevalence of sexual abuse and harassment.

The recent ruling overturning Harvey Weinstein's conviction in New York sparked a variety of reactions. His attorneys stated that it validated their belief of an unfair trial, while his accusers and their supporters viewed the decision as a setback in holding perpetrators of sexual violence accountable for their actions.

The charges in New York were primarily based on the testimonies of Haley and Jessica Mann. Haley recounted how Weinstein forcibly engaged in oral sex with her in 2006 at his Manhattan apartment, while Mann testified that he raped her in 2013 within the context of an abusive relationship.

CNN

video

Related video

Harvey Weinstein's accuser shared her experience of being silenced. Additionally, three other women testified at the trial as "prior bad acts" witnesses. Prosecutors aimed to show a pattern of abuse. The three women - Dawn Dunning, Tarale Wulff, and Lauren Young - revealed how Weinstein exploited his power to manipulate them when they were aspiring young individuals trying to enter the film industry.

After Harvey Weinstein was found guilty in New York, his lawyers decided to appeal the verdict. They believed that the witnesses who testified about his past behavior should not have been allowed, and that the prosecutors should not have been able to question Weinstein about instances of verbal abuse and bullying. In the end, Weinstein chose not to testify himself.

The Court of Appeals sided with Weinstein's defense team, stating that the trial court had made a mistake by allowing testimony about uncharged sexual acts that were not related to the current case. They said that this testimony did not serve any relevant purpose in the trial.

The use of witnesses who testify about the prior bad acts of a defendant has been on the rise, especially with the increased awareness brought by the #MeToo movement. In cases of sexual assault, their testimony can help shift a challenging "he said, she said" scenario to a more compelling "he said, they said" situation.

Typically, presenting evidence of a defendant's questionable character or past wrongdoings is not permitted during a trial. This restriction is in place due to concerns that the jury may be unduly swayed by these prior incidents, potentially overlooking the actual evidence related to the alleged crime.

CNN’s Ray Sanchez contributed to this report.

Editor's P/S:

The resurgence of