The Spanish parliament passed a controversial amnesty law on Thursday. This law could help many individuals who are currently facing legal consequences for their involvement in the failed independence movement in Catalonia back in 2017.
The bill was proposed by Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s Socialist Party last year. The vote for the bill in Spain’s lower house of parliament resulted in 177 in favor and 172 against, as announced by the speaker.
Two Catalan separatist parties, Junts (Together) and Esquerra Republicana (Republican Left), played a crucial role by providing support with seven seats each in the Spanish parliament.
On the other hand, Spain's main opposition conservative Popular Party and the far-right Vox party opposed the measure. Madrid regional government president Isabel Diaz Ayuso, from the Popular Party, declared her intention to challenge the new law in Spain's Constitutional Court, the highest court in the country.
This is a developing story and will be updated.
Editor's P/S:
The amnesty law passed by the Spanish parliament has sparked controversy and divided opinions. While some believe it is a necessary step towards reconciliation and resolving the Catalan independence crisis, others view it as a betrayal of the rule of law and an attempt to appease separatists. The law's passage has reignited tensions between Catalonia and the central government, and it remains to be seen whether it will ultimately contribute to a peaceful resolution of the conflict.
The debate over the amnesty law reflects the deep divisions within Spanish society on the issue of Catalan independence. Those who support the law argue that it is a necessary gesture of reconciliation and that it will help to heal the wounds caused by the failed independence referendum in 2017. They also point out that the law does not grant amnesty to those who have been convicted of violent crimes. However, those who oppose the law argue that it sends the wrong message and that it will embolden separatists. They also fear that it will weaken the rule of law and undermine the authority of the state.