Comparing Transformational and Transactional Leadership

People all over the world discuss and write about leadership on a daily basis. However, defining leadership in words can be difficult due to its complexity. Throughout history, various forms of leadership have been observed and exceptional leaders have emerged, making their mark in their respective fields. These leaders have varied in their leadership styles, level of connection with their team, and unique personalities and beliefs.

Transformational leadership involves a leader and their team identifying challenges, available resources, and building a long-term vision while constantly engaging and involving employees to perform at their best and grow personally and professionally.

The crux of transformational leadership lies in the leader's focus not only on personal performance and goals, but also on actively guiding and mentoring their subordinates. By utilizing their experience and expertise, the leader strives to provide their team members with the tools and support needed to build successful professional careers.

Transactional leadership is centered around motivating employees through their personal interests related to the task at hand. The leader's authority is derived from their position within the organization, and employees are expected to follow their instructions as a result. In order to incentivize employees, this leadership style utilizes both rewards and punishments. Those who meet or exceed expectations are rewarded, while those who underperform face consequences.

In examining the definitions, some distinctions may become apparent, however, there are also more nuanced differences to consider. One such difference lies in the approach to problem recognition and solving within transformational and transactional leadership. In the former, proactive measures are taken to anticipate and address potential problems, while in the latter, a reactive approach is taken once the problem has already emerged, with steps being formulated in response to the situation at hand.

A transformational leader is known for their ability to reshape an organization's culture and create a new vision for the future. This approach is particularly effective when a brand requires a significant overhaul. In contrast, a transactional leader tends to work within the established company culture, adhering to rules, regulations, and established practices. They are less interested in changing the framework within which they operate.

Due to the rigid rules and procedures they follow, transactional leaders are often labeled as bureaucratic. In contrast, transformational leaders tend to be more charismatic, with their personality playing a significant role in their leadership style.

A transformational leader may not necessarily be the sole leader, as there can be multiple individuals who embody this style. Conversely, transactional leadership typically involves a single designated leader who uses rewards and punishments to motivate their subordinates. The key distinction lies in how the leader inspires and influences their followers; a transformational leader utilizes their charisma to gather a loyal following and earn respect, while a transactional leader relies on more traditional forms of motivation.

A transformational leader focuses on the overall vision and innovation of the organization, while a transactional leader prioritizes short-term planning and execution. Depending on the business environment, a transformational leader may be better suited for a turbulent and unstable situation, while a settled environment may benefit from a transactional leader who can maintain established processes and practices. These contrasting leadership styles have significant differences.

NEXT

Transformational leadership

PREV

Transactional leadership