Comparing the Salaries of the Harry Potter Cast: From Start to Finish

The Harry Potter franchise has been a massive success, earning over $9.5 billion worldwide for Warner Bros. Fans are curious about how much Daniel Radcliffe made from Harry Potter, along with his co-stars Rupert Grint and Emma Watson. The series, based on J.K. Rowling's books, follows the friendship of Harry (Radcliffe), Ron (Grint), and Hermione (Watson) at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry.

Although hesitant to join the cast of Harry Potter and the Cursed Child, the trio reunited for a 20th-anniversary special. Radcliffe, Watson, and Grint will always be remembered for their iconic roles in the Harry Potter series, but they have since grown in their respective careers. Radcliffe has appeared in both plays and movies, Watson received acclaim for Beauty and the Beast and Little Women, and Grint is a success on Apple TV+'s Servant. Fans still wonder how much the cast of Harry Potter earned during their time in the magical world.

How Much Daniel Radcliffe Was Paid For Harry Potter

(Beginning: $1 Million/Ending: $50 Million)

Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) getting his wand in Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone - (Beginning: $1 Million/Ending: $50 Million) - How Much Daniel Radcliffe Was Paid For Harry Potter

Back in 2001, Daniel Radcliffe landed the role of Harry Potter and quickly became a global sensation. Despite his young age, he portrayed the mischievous and brave wizard with perfection. Celebrity Net Worth revealed that Radcliffe earned a whopping $1 million for his role in the first film, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. In comparison, Daisy Ridley received only $100,000 for her role as Rey in Star Wars: The Force Awakens.

Radcliffe's salary for the Harry Potter movies increased significantly as he took on more prominent roles. In the Chamber of Secrets, he earned $3 million, which doubled to $6 million for the Prisoner of Azkaban, and then to $11 million for the Goblet of Fire. For the final two movies, he made a whopping $50 million each, totaling $109 million by the end of the series (via Cosmopolitan).

How Much Emma Watson Was Paid For Harry Potter

(Beginning:<$1 Million/Ending: $30 Million)

Emma Watson as young Hermione Granger - (Beginning:<$1 Million/Ending: $30 Million) - How Much Emma Watson Was Paid For Harry Potter

Hermione, a talented Muggle-born witch, played a vital role in the trio, often being the voice of reason and rescuing her friends from tricky situations. After her time as Hermione Granger, Watson has taken on significant roles beyond Harry Potter. While she may not have as many acting credits as Radcliffe post-Potter, Watson has become a highly successful and popular star. One of her most notable roles was in the live-action remake of Beauty and the Beast, which grossed $1.26 billion. However, it was her time in the magical world of Harry Potter that largely contributed to her current wealth.

Rupert Grint's Earnings from Harry Potter

Rupert Grint, who portrayed Ron Weasley in the Harry Potter series, started his journey at a young age. Like his co-stars, he began with a modest salary for the first movie. As the popularity of both the movies and his character grew, so did his earnings. While the exact figures for each film are undisclosed, it is known that Grint received $4 million for Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. His most significant paycheck, however, came with the final installment of the franchise, where he was paid a whopping $30 million (via Cosmopolitan).

(Beginning:<$1 Million/Ending: $30 Million)

Ron Weasley in Sorcere's stone - (Beginning:<$1 Million/Ending: $30 Million) - How Much Rupert Grint Was Paid For Harry Potter

Rupert Grint portrayed Ron Weasley in the Harry Potter series, completing the trio of main characters. Ron, being one of seven children in the Weasley family, was a loyal friend to Harry and played a crucial role in defeating Voldemort. The directors praised Grint during the 20th-anniversary reunion, stating that he truly embodied the character of Ron in Harry Potter.

Grint's salary for the Harry Potter series started below $1 million for the first film, but increased to $4 million as the franchise progressed. Like Emma Watson, he earned $30 million for his role in the final two-part Harry Potter movie. Despite this, Grint has the lowest net worth of the three main actors. Daniel Radcliffe, who played Harry Potter, amassed his wealth through leading the series and continued work, while Watson earned millions from fashion brand endorsements. Grint, on the other hand, has had a quieter career after the Harry Potter series concluded.

Editor's P/S:

The Harry Potter franchise has been an extraordinary success, capturing the hearts of millions worldwide. The iconic trio of Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint, who brought Harry, Hermione, and Ron to life, have become household names. The article delves into the financial rewards they reaped from their involvement in the magical world, revealing the staggering sums they earned as the series progressed. It's fascinating to witness the exponential growth in their salaries, reflecting the immense popularity and cultural significance of the Harry Potter phenomenon.

While the financial success of the cast is undoubtedly impressive, it's also important to acknowledge their exceptional talent and the enduring impact they have made on the entertainment industry. Radcliffe, Watson, and Grint have continued to pursue their passions, showcasing their versatility and solidifying their status as true stars. Their journey serves as a testament to the power of storytelling and the transformative experiences it can create for both actors and audiences alike.