The Controversial Casting Choices
Exodus: Gods and Kings featured Christian Bale as Moses, Joel Edgerton as Ramses II, and Aaron Paul as Joshua, and an extended cast of mainly white actors. The 1300 BC Egyptian setting of Exodus meant that this casting was neither biblically nor historically accurate and director Ridley Scott received criticism over perceived whitewashing at the time of release. In an interview with Variety, Scott gave a controversial and blunt response to the issue stating the film would not receive financing if the lead actor were 'Mohammad so-and-so from such-and-such' and that the question of casting non-white actors 'never came up.'
Joel Edgerton as Ramses II looking scared in Exodus Gods and Kings
The Biblical Story Was Much More Diverse
Joel Edgerton as Ramses and Christian Bale as Moses in Exodus: Gods and Kings
Ridley Scott’s biblical epic Exodus: Gods and Kings controversially made significant changes from the book of the Bible that it was based on. As a director who has repeatedly dismissed concerns about accuracy, throughout his career Scott has been more concerned with providing an entertaining film than he has been with rigidly adhering to the expected retelling of events. While this makes for a more exciting big-budget spectacle in his 2014 movie Exodus: Gods and Kings, it also led to criticism from Christian groups who felt the agnostic director was veering too far away from the original story.
A New Family Dynamic
Ridley Scott’s version of Exodus positioned the real historical pharaoh Ramses II as the adopted brother of Moses, who was found as a baby and accepted into the Egyptian royal family. However, the biblical story stated that Moses was the son of an unnamed Pharaoh’s daughter, and, had he grown up in the time of Ramses, that would have made him Moses' uncle (via Exodus 2.) The version depicted in Exodus made for a much more compelling narrative and added a sibling rivalry dimension to the film that was absent from the biblical story.
Christian Bale as Moses in the middle of battle in Exodus Gods and Kings
Moses Had No Rival Pharaoh Brother
Joel Edgerton as Ramses II in Exodus Gods and Kings
A Different Portrayal of Moses
In the biblical story of Exodus, Moses was a messenger of God and carried out his wishes without actively pursuing bloodshed. However, when Exodus: Gods and Kings was released there was concern that Moses was being envisioned as less of a messenger and more of a freedom fighter. Actor Christian Bale controversially described Moses as 'a terrorist in terms of the Egyptian empire' and if he were alive today 'drones would be sent after him' (via ABC News.) While scenes showcasing Moses leading guerrilla fighters against Egyptians may not have been biblically accurate, they certainly upped the tension in Exodus.
Christian Bale as Moses wielding an Egyptian sword in Exodus Gods and Kings
Moses Was A Lover Not A Fighter
Christian Bale as Moses in Exodus Gods and Kings
Unconventional Depiction of God
In Exodus: Gods and Kings God was portrayed by an 11-year-old English schoolboy named Isaac Andrews, which was a lot different from the biblical story of God speaking to Moses through a burning bush. While the bush does appear in the film, director Ridley Scott chose to have the young boy, named Malak (Hebrew for angel or messenger) do the talking. 'Sacred texts give no specific depiction of God, so for centuries artists and filmmakers have had to choose their own visual depiction. Malak exudes innocence and purity, and those two qualities are extremely powerful,' Scott said (via The Independent.)
Isaac Andrews as Malak in Exodus Gods and Kings
God Speaks Through The Burning Bush Not The Boy
Christian Bale as Moses with head scarf on in Exodus Gods and Kings
Iconic Imagery Reimagined
The classic depiction of Moses has always had him holding his signature staff. This was more than just an artistic choice and was mentioned in Exodus 4:2 when God asked Moses what he was holding, and he replied, 'a staff.' But in Exodus: God and Kings this iconic staff was nowhere to be seen and instead, Moses wielded an Egyptian sword during the climax of the film at the parting of the Red Sea. Omissions such as these demonstrated how significantly director Ridley Scott strayed from the biblical version of this story.
Christian Bale as Moses gives a speech at the Red Sea in Exodus Gods and Kings
Moses Wielded A Staff And Not A Sword
Divergent Plot Points
In the biblical story of Exodus, Moses murdered an Egyptian man who had been attacking a Hebrew slave. Once his crime became known Moses fled Egypt and the grand exodus of the story was set in motion. In Exodus: Gods and Kings, Moses still murdered an Egyptian, but this was not why he fled Egypt. Instead, Moses was forced to flee when the Pharaoh Ramses II suspected that he was born Hebrew and may be the one prophesied to lead his people out of Egypt.
Exodus Gods and Kings the Plague of the Crocodiles
The Hebrews Fled For A Different Reason
Exodus Gods and Kings the Plague of the Crocodiles
Characterization of Moses
Christian Bale as Moses gave rousing speeches to the fleeing Hebrews at the Red Sea in Exodus: Gods and Kings, however, in the biblical story, Moses was described as a much quieter man who was 'slow of speech and tongue' (Exodus 4:10) would not have been one to address large crowds in the fashion portrayed in the film. While the story of Moses as a meek man portrayed in the Bible makes for a humble characterization in the text, the story of a quiet man sheepishly carrying out God’s wishes would have made for a much less compelling film.
Exodus Gods and Kings the Plague of the Crocodiles
Moses Was Slow Of Speech And Tongue
Exodus Gods and Kings the Plague of the Crocodiles
Reimagining the Plagues
The biblical Plagues of Egypt are significantly reimagined in Exodus: Gods and Kings, with a crocodile attack gnawing on the fisherman and turning the sea red with blood being one of the film's most outright changes. In the Bible, Moses stuck his staff into the water of the Nile and transformed the water into blood (via Exodus 7:20). However, director Ridley Scott said he was instead inspired by National Geographic 'where I’d seen a frenzy of crocs going after some poor buffalo' (via New York Times.)
Exodus Gods and Kings the Plague of the Crocodiles
The Crocodile Plague Was Not In The Bible
Exodus Gods and Kings Christian Bale as the Red Sea
Scientific vs Religious Explanation
One of the most controversial biblical changes Exodus: Gods and Kings made was related to the parting of the Red Sea. In the original story, under God’s command, Moses held his staff and the water parted for the Israelites to walk through (Exodus 14:21 & 22). However, director Ridley Scott stated in his version the parting was caused by a tsunami and provided a scientific explanation rather than a religious one (via LA Times.) Exodus: Gods and Kings visual effects' supervisor Peter Chiang said this change allowed for 'the spectacle of this 180-foot wave' in the film (via USA Today.)
Exodus Gods and Kings a crowd
The Parting Of The Red Sea Was A Miracle Not A Tsunami
Exodus Gods and Kings a crowd
Deviation from Biblical Outcome
After the parting of the Red Sea in Exodus: Gods and Kings, the majority of the Egyptians are killed by the wrath of the ocean. However, Ramses was still seen alive on the beach, forced to bear witness to the destruction of his army. This was not biblically accurate as Exodus 14:27 – 28 stated: 'God dumped the Egyptians in the middle of the sea. The waters returned, drowning the chariots and riders of Pharaoh’s army that had chased after Israel into the sea. Not one of them survived.' This leaves very little room to interpret the Pharaoh as still alive.
Exodus Gods and Kings a crowd at the Red Sea 2014
Ramses II Should Not Have Survived The Wrath Of The Sea
Exodus Gods and Kings a crowd at the Red Sea 2014