10 TV Shows That Are Worse Than The Books They're Based On

Introduction

In the age of television, the adaptation of books into TV shows has become a common practice. However, many TV shows fail to live up to the quality of their source material, sparking debates about which version is better. From fantasy epics to classic novels, the transition from page to screen is often a challenging endeavor.

game-of-thrones-cast

Game Of Thrones

HBO's adaptation of George R.R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire series, Game of Thrones, is a widely known example of a novel to TV adaptation. While the show has its merits, the depth and scale of Martin's books are often considered superior. As the series progressed, it began to deviate from the original narratives, leading to a decline in quality.

Game of Thrones Red Wedding

The Witcher

Netflix's The Witcher, based on Andrzej Sapkowski's novels, initially seemed like a promising adaptation. However, the series deviated too far from the source material, resulting in a decline in quality. The accessibility and depth of the books make them a more worthwhile experience compared to the TV series.

Geralt squinting at a kikimora in The Witcher season 1.

The Rings Of Power

Prime Video's The Rings of Power, based on J.R.R. Tolkien's works, attempts to capture the essence of Tolkien's language but falls short in character development compared to the original novels. The series takes creative liberties and draws from other Tolkien collections, resulting in a loose adaptation of the Second Age of Middle Earth.

The-Lord-Of-The-Rings-The-Rings-Of-Power-Wallpapers